Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31679098›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2020

Diagnostic trajectories in child and adolescent mental health services: exploring the prevalence and patterns of diagnostic adjustments in an electronic mental health case register.

Cliodhna O'Connor, Johnny Downs, Hitesh Shetty, Fiona McNicholas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cliodhna O'ConnorSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. cliodhna.oconnor1@ucd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8134-075X
Johnny DownsNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Hitesh ShettyNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Fiona McNicholasSchool of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IEKing's College London · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2018-18-ST2-014H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 702970Medical Research Council MR/L017105/1Royal Irish Academy Charlemont Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-based epidemiological studies show transitions between psychiatric disorders are common during child development. However, little research has explored the prevalence or patterns of the diagnostic adjustments that occur in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS). Understanding diagnostic trajectories is necessary to inform theory development in developmental psychopathology and clinical judgements regarding risk and prognosis. In this study, data from CAMHS clinical records were extracted from a British mental health case register (N = 12,543). Analysis calculated the proportion of children whose clinical records showed a longitudinal diagnostic adjustment (i.e. addition of a subsequent diagnosis of a different diagnostic class, at > 30 days' distance from their first diagnosis). Regression analyses investigated typical diagnostic sequences and their relationships with socio-demographic variables, service use and standardised measures of mental health. Analysis found that 19.3% of CAMHS attendees had undergone a longitudinal diagnostic adjustment. Ethnicity, diagnostic class and symptom profiles significantly influenced the likelihood of a diagnostic adjustment. Affective and anxiety/stress-related disorders longitudinally predicted each other, as did hyperkinetic and conduct disorders, and hyperkinetic and pervasive developmental disorders. Results suggest that approximately one in five young service users have their original psychiatric diagnosis revised or supplemented during their time in CAMHS. By revealing the most common diagnostic sequences, this study enables policy makers to anticipate future service needs and clinicians to make informed projections about their patients' likely trajectories. Further research is required to understand how young people experience diagnostic adjustments and their psychological and pragmatic implications.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesPrevalenceRegistriesTelemedicineCase registerChild and adolescent psychiatryDiagnosisLongitudinal

Identifiers

PMID31679098
PMCPMC7369254
OpenAlexW2986793372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.