Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31679081›Full record

ReviewAngiogenesis2020

Vessel co-option in glioblastoma: emerging insights and opportunities.

Giorgio Seano, Rakesh K Jain

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Angiogenesis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effect of aerobic exercise on tumour blood delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giorgio SeanoTumor Microenvironment Laboratory, Institut Curie Research Center, Paris Saclay University, PSL Research University, Inserm U1021, CNRS UMR3347, Orsay, 91405, France. giorgio.seano@curie.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-7294-302X
Rakesh K JainEdwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. jain@steele.mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7571-3548
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHarvard University · US

Funding

Vascular Normalization: Rolse of Perivascular CellsP01CA080124 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JAIN, RAKESH K. · 2000 to 2016
$35.0M
AZD2171 and chemoradiation for newly diagnosed glioblastomaR01CA129371 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BATCHELOR, TRACY T · 2007 to 2017
$6.2M
Dissecting Pediatric Brain Tumor Microenvironment to Improve TreatmentR35CA197743 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JAIN, RAKESH K. · 2015 to 2020
$5.7M
Reprogramming PDAC tumor microenvironment to improve immunotherapyU01CA224348 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BOUCHER, YVES, JAIN, RAKESH K. · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Reengineering obesity-induced abnormal microenvironment to improve PDAC treatmentR01CA208205 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FUKUMURA, DAI, JAIN, RAKESH K. · 2017 to 2020
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA080124NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129371NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208205NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197743NCI NIH HHS U01 CA224348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vessel co-option is the movement of cancer cells towards and along the pre-existing vasculature and is an alternative to angiogenesis to gain access to nutrients. Vessel co-option has been shown as a strategy employed by some glioblastoma (GBM) cells to invade further into the brain, leading to one of the greatest challenges in treating GBM. In GBM, vessel co-option may be an intrinsic feature or an acquired mechanism of resistance to anti-angiogenic treatment. Here, we describe the histological features and the dynamics visualized through intravital microscopy of vessel co-option in GBM, as well as the molecular players discovered until now. We also highlight key unanswered questions, as answering these is critical to improve understanding of GBM progression and for developing more effective approaches for GBM treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHumansModels, BiologicalNeovascularization, PathologicSignal TransductionAnti-angiogenesisCell migrationGlioblastomaTumor microenvironmentVessel co-option

Identifiers

PMID31679081
PMCPMC7012982
OpenAlexW2989543702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.