ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2020
Short-term safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia in children.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcome reporting in studies of paediatric achalasia: A systematic review.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Outcomes of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Dysphagia · 2022Pooled it
- Therapeutic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Pediatric Gastroenterology.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Pooled it
- Characteristics and predictors of technically difficult peroral endoscopic myotomy in esophageal motility disorders: a high-volume center analysis of 676 procedures.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Peroral endoscopic myotomy in children with achalasia: A review of the literature.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy for treating achalasia in pediatric and geriatric patients: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
- Peroral endoscopic myotomy is an effective treatment for achalasia combined with hiatal hernia.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Per-oral endoscopic myotomy is safe and effective for pediatric patients with achalasia: A long-term follow-up study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Pediatric Achalasia: A Retrospective Analysis of 21 Cases With a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- POEM Is a Durable Treatment in Children and Adolescents With Achalasia Cardia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Effect and safety of mark-guidedWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy in children with esophageal achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown excellent results for the treatment of achalasia in adults, but studies for children are limited. The study was aimed to analyze outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in children and compared with those in adults in a large multi-center study.
methodsRecords of consecutive patients with achalasia who underwent POEM at three tertiary centers were reviewed. A total of 130 children were included in this study. The primary outcomes of perioperative outcomes and clinical follow-up data were analyzed.
resultsOne child (0.8%) experienced technical failure. Five children (3.8%) had major adverse events, including one with pneumothorax requiring drainage, two with delayed mucosa barrier failure, one with readmission, and one with vital-sign instability. Both post-POEM Eckardt score and median LES pressure were significantly lower than their pre-POEM reference values in children (0.7 vs 7.4; 7.0 vs 27.1 mmHg; both P < 0.001). During a median follow-up time of 40 months, clinical reflux rate was 27.0% and clinical failure rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 1.8%, 3.5%, and 4.4% for children. The technical failure, major adverse events, and postoperative clinical reflux were comparable between children and adults (all P > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the risk of clinical failure was lower in children than adults (log-rank test, hazard ratio = 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.91, P = 0.023).
conclusionsPOEM can be safely performed in children with achalasia, and produce a better clinical response during long-term follow-up compared with that in adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.