Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31678958›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2020

Obstetric care navigation: results of a quality improvement project to provide accompaniment to women for facility-based maternity care in rural Guatemala.

Kirsten Austad, Michel Juarez, Hannah Shryer, Cristina Moratoya, Peter Rohloff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cultural brokering in pregnancy care: A critical review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Blood pressure in a pregnant, rural Guatemalan population: Results from a quality improvement database.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kirsten AustadWuqu' Kawoq - Maya Health Alliance, Tecpán, Guatemala kirsten@wuqukawoq.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5237-2955
Michel JuarezWuqu' Kawoq - Maya Health Alliance, Tecpán, Guatemala.
Hannah ShryerWuqu' Kawoq - Maya Health Alliance, Tecpán, Guatemala.
Cristina MoratoyaWuqu' Kawoq - Maya Health Alliance, Tecpán, Guatemala.
Peter RohloffWuqu' Kawoq - Maya Health Alliance, Tecpán, Guatemala.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany maternal and perinatal deaths in low-resource settings are preventable. Inadequate access to timely, quality care in maternity facilities drives poor outcomes, especially where women deliver at home with traditional birth attendants (TBA). Yet few solutions exist to support TBA-initiated referrals or address reasons patients frequently refuse facility care, such as disrespectful and abusive treatment. We hypothesised that deploying accompaniers-obstetric care navigators (OCN)-trained to provide integrated patient support would facilitate referrals from TBAs to public hospitals.

methodsThis project built on an existing collaboration with 41 TBAs who serve indigenous Maya villages in Guatemala's Western Highlands, which provided baseline data for comparison. When TBAs detected pregnancy complications, families were offered OCN referral support. Implementation was guided by bimonthly meetings of the interdisciplinary quality improvement team where the OCN role was iteratively tailored. The primary process outcomes were referral volume, proportion of births receiving facility referral, and referral success rate, which were analysed using statistical process control methods.

resultsOver the 12-month pilot, TBAs attended 847 births. The median referral volume rose from 14 to 27.5, meeting criteria for special cause variation, without a decline in success rate. The proportion of births receiving facility-level care increased from 24±6% to 62±20% after OCN implementation. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and prolonged labour were the most common referral indications. The OCN role evolved to include a number of tasks, such as expediting emergency transportation and providing doula-like labour support.

conclusionsOCN accompaniment increased the proportion of births under TBA care that received facility-level obstetric care. Results from this of obstetric care navigation suggest it is a feasible, patient-centred intervention to improve maternity care.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementAdultDelivery, ObstetricDeveloping CountriesFemaleGuatemalaHospitals, MaternityHumansMaternal Health ServicesMaternal MortalityMidwiferyPilot ProjectsPregnancyProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationQuality of Health Carecare navigationdisrespect and abusehealth disparitiesindigenousLatin Americamaternal mortalityquality improvementrespectful maternity care

Identifiers

PMID31678958
PMCPMC7045784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.