Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31678955›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Determinants of vaccine hesitancy in Switzerland: study protocol of a mixed-methods national research programme.

Michael J Deml, Kristen Jafflin, Sonja Merten, Benedikt Huber, Andrea Buhl, Eleonora Frau, Valérie Mettraux, Joanna Sonderegger, Paulina Kliem, Rachele Cattalani and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Political Populism, Institutional Distrust and Vaccination Uptake: A Mediation Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michael J Deml *Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2224-8173
Kristen Jafflin *Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Sonja Merten *Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Benedikt HuberDepartment of Pediatrics, HFR Fribourg Cantonal Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Andrea BuhlSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Eleonora FrauUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Valérie MettrauxUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Joanna SondereggerUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Paulina KliemUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Rachele CattalaniUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel KrüerkeKlinik Arlesheim, Arlesheim, Switzerland.
Constanze PfeifferSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Claudine Burton-JeangrosInstitute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Philip E TarrUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland philip.tarr@unibas.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVaccine hesitancy is a complex public health issue referring to concerns about the safety, efficacy or need for vaccination. Relatively little is known about vaccine hesitancy in Switzerland. This ongoing study (2017-2021) focuses on biomedical and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers and their patients since healthcare professionals play important roles in vaccination decision-making. This national research programme seeks to assess the sociocultural determinants of vaccine hesitancy regarding childhood and human papillomavirus vaccines in Switzerland. We aim to provide a detailed characterisation of vaccine hesitancy, including CAM and biomedical perspectives, patient-provider interactions, and sociocultural factors, to establish the mediating effects of vaccine hesitancy on underimmunisation, and to design an intervention to improve vaccination communication and counselling among physicians, parents and adolescents. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our transdisciplinary team employs a sequential exploratory mixed-methods study design. We have established a network of more than 150 medical providers across Switzerland, including more than 40 CAM practitioners. For the qualitative component, we conduct interviews with parents, youth, and biomedical and CAM providers and observations of vaccination consultations and school vaccination information sessions. For the quantitative component, a sample of 1350 parents of young children and 722 young adults (15-26 years) and their medical providers respond to questionnaires. We measure vaccine hesitancy with the Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines 15-item survey and review vaccination certificates to assess vaccination status. We administer additional questions based on findings from qualitative research, addressing communication with medical providers, vaccine information sources and perceptions of risk control vis-à-vis vaccine-preventable diseases. The questionnaires capture sociodemographics, political views, religion and spirituality, and moral foundations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the local ethics committee. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated to healthcare professionals, researchers and the public via conferences and public presentations.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthParentsResearch DesignVaccinationAdolescentAdultComplementary TherapiesConsumer Health InformationDecision MakingFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePhysiciansProfessional-Family RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesChildhood vaccinationscomplementary and alternative medicine (CAM)HPV vaccinationMixed methods researchPatient-provider communicationUnder-immunisationVaccination information sourcesVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID31678955
PMCPMC6830664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.