Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31678740›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2020

Ruthenium oxide based microelectrode arrays for in vitro and in vivo neural recording and stimulation.

Rahul Atmaramani, Bitan Chakraborty, Rashed T Rihani, Joshua Usoro, Audrey Hammack, Justin Abbott, Patrick Nnoromele, Bryan J Black, Joseph J Pancrazio, Stuart F Cogan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Effect of Physical Structural Properties on Electrochemical Properties of Ruthenium Oxide for Neural Stimulating and Recording Electrodes.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Charge injection characteristics of sputtered ruthenium oxide electrodes for neural stimulation and recording.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Sputtered ruthenium oxide coatings for neural stimulation and recording electrodes.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rahul AtmaramaniDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Bitan ChakrabortyDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Rashed T RihaniDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Joshua UsoroDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Audrey HammackDepartment of Research, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Justin AbbottDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Patrick NnoromeleDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Bryan J BlackDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Joseph J PancrazioDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.
Stuart F CoganDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA. Electronic address: stuart.cogan@utdallas.edu.
The University of Texas at Dallas · US

Funding

Scalable Electrode Technology for High Resolution Chronic Recording of BrainR01NS104344 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI COGAN, STUART F, MILLER, LEE · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have characterized the in vitro and in vivo extracellular neural recording and stimulation properties of ruthenium oxide (RuOx) based microelectrodes. Cytotoxicity and functional neurotoxicity assays were carried out to confirm the in vitro biocompatibility of RuOx. Material extract assays, in accordance to ISO protocol "10993-5: Biological evaluation of medical devices", revealed no significant effect on neuronal cell viability or the functional activity of cortical networks. In vitro microelectrode arrays (MEAs), with indium tin oxide (ITO) sites modified with sputtered iridium oxide (IrOx) and RuOx in a single array, were developed for a direct comparison of electrochemical and recording performance of RuOx to ITO and IrOx deposited microelectrode sites. The impedance of the RuOx-coated electrodes measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was notably lower than that of ITO electrodes, resulting in robust extracellular recordings from cortical networks in vitro. We found comparable signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for RuOx and IrOx, both significantly higher than the SNR for ITO. RuOx-based MEAs were also fabricated and implanted in the rat motor cortex to demonstrate manufacturability of the RuOx processing and acute recording capabilities in vivo. We observed single-unit extracellular action potentials with a SNR >22, representing a first step for neurophysiological recordings in vivo with RuOx based microelectrodes. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: A critical challenge in neural interface technology is the development of microelectrodes that have recording and electrical stimulation capabilities suitable for bidirectional communication between the external electronic device and the nervous system. The present study explores the feasibility and functional capabilities of ruthenium oxide microelectrodes as a neural interface. Significant improvement in electrochemical properties and neuronal recordings are reported when compared to commercially available indium tin oxide and was similar to that of iridium oxide electrodes. The data demonstrate the potential for future development of chronic neural interfaces using ruthenium oxide based microelectrodes for recording and stimulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCells, CulturedCerebral CortexElectric StimulationElectrochemical TechniquesEmbryo, MammalianFemaleMice, Inbred ICRMicroelectrodesNeuronsNeurotoxinsOxidesRats, Long-EvansRutheniumNeurotoxinsOxidesRutheniumCortical networksIridium oxideMulti-electrode arraysNeuronal recordingRuthenium oxide

Identifiers

PMID31678740
PMCPMC7197741
OpenAlexW2988056603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.