ReviewRedox biology2020
New potential biomarker for stratification of patients for pharmacological vitamin C in adjuvant settings of cancer therapy.
Review in Redox biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dietary Vitamin A Intake and Circulating Vitamin A Concentrations and the Risk of Three Common Cancers in Women: A Meta-Analysis.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Pooled it
- High-dose vitamin C as a metabolic treatment of cancer: a new dimension in the era of adjuvant and intensive therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Review
- Sex-dependent adaptations in heart mitochondria from transgenic mice overexpressing cytochrome bMitochondrion · 2025Article
- Review
- Redox-Cycling "Mitocans" as Effective New Developments in Anticancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Oxidative Status Determines the Cytotoxicity of Ascorbic Acid in Human Oral Normal and Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Identification of Agents That Ameliorate Hyperphosphatemia-Suppressed Myogenin Expression Involved in the Nrf2/p62 Pathway in C2C12 Skeletal Muscle Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Antioxidant Therapy in Cancer: Rationale and Progress.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Article
- Review
- Melatonin: Regulation of Biomolecular Condensates in Neurodegenerative Disorders.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Mechanisms and Applications of the Anti-cancer Effect of Pharmacological Ascorbic Acid in Cervical Cancer Cells.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Selective Targeting of Cancerous Mitochondria and Suppression of Tumor Growth Using Redox-Active Treatment Adjuvant.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our graphical review expands the analysis of cancer vulnerabilities for high dose vitamin C, based on several facts, illustrating the cytotoxic potential of the ascorbate free radical (AFR) via impairment of mitochondrial respiration and the mechanisms of its elimination in mammals by the membrane-bound NADH:cytochrome b5 oxidoreductase 3 (Cyb5R3). We propose that vitamin C can function in "protective mode" or "destructive mode" affecting cellular homeostasis, depending on the intracellular "steady-state" concentration of AFR and differential expression/activity of Cyb5R3 in cancerous and normal cells. Thus, a specific anti-cancer effect can be achieved at high doses of vitamin C therapy. The review is intended for a wide audience of readers - from students to specialists in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.