Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31678714›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2020

The engineering of spatially linked microbial consortia - potential and perspectives.

Sami Ben Said, Robin Tecon, Benedict Borer, Dani Or

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mutualism between degraders and nondegraders stabilizes the function of a natural biopolymer-degrading community.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Construction of a syntrophicSynthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sami Ben SaidMicrobial Systems Ecology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland. Electronic address: sbensaid@usys.ethz.ch.
Robin TeconSoil and Terrestrial Environmental Physics, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Benedict BorerSoil and Terrestrial Environmental Physics, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Dani OrSoil and Terrestrial Environmental Physics, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional biotechnological applications of microorganisms employ mono-cultivation or co-cultivation in well-mixed vessels disregarding the potential of spatially organized cultures. Metabolic specialization and guided species interactions facilitated through spatial isolation would enable consortia of microbes to accomplish more complex functions than currently possible, for bioproduction as well as biodegradation processes. Here, we review concepts of spatially linked microbial consortia in which spatial arrangement is optimized to increase control and facilitate new species combinations. We highlight that genome-scale metabolic network models can inform the design and tuning of synthetic microbial consortia and suggest that a standardized assembly of such systems allows the combination of 'incompatibles', potentially leading to countless novel applications.

Indexed as

Microbial ConsortiaSynthetic BiologyBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBiotechnologyMetabolic Networks and Pathways

Identifiers

PMID31678714
PMCPMC7208534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.