ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2019
A case of nodular fasciitis that was difficult to distinguish from sarcoma.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mind the Pitfall: Solitary Nodular Fasciitis Mimicking Extra-Nodal Manifestation of Hodgkin Lymphoma on [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Intra-Articular Nodular Fasciitis of the Knee, A Rare Clinical Presentation and Histological Diagnosis: A Case Report.Orthopedic reviews · 2024Article
- Article
- Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Utility of high-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2022Article
- Malignant primary intraosseus synovial sarcoma - a rare case report.Radiology case reports · 2022Article
- Nodular fasciitis of the anterior chest wall mimicking myxofibrosarcoma: A case report and literature review.Radiology case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNodular fasciitis is a reactive proliferative lesion. It is often difficult to distinguish from sarcoma, such as malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). Therefore, both pathological findings and clinical features must be considered. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 75-year-old man presented with a 1 × 1 cm mass on his left forearm that had enlarged rapidly without specific symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a mass adjacent to brachioradialis. The lesion showed iso-intensity to muscle on T1-weighted images and hyperintensity on T2-weighted images. We made a clinical diagnosis of nodular fasciitis. Under observation, the mass gradually decreased in size and disappeared after two months. Four years later, another lesion appeared at the same site. We performed total excisional biopsy and histopathological examination indicated low grade MPNST or recurrent nodular fasciitis. Since malignancy could not be excluded, wide resection was performed. At 4 years postoperatively, there has been no recurrence. DISCUSSION: In this patient, nodular fasciitis of the right forearm was diagnosed clinically and showed spontaneous regression. However, recurrence was noted after four years. While the clinical features suggested recurrent nodular fasciitis, pathological findings indicated the possibility of low grade MPNST.
conclusionWhen it is difficult to determine whether a lesion such as nodular fasciitis is benign or malignant, the patient should be managed by considering the possibility of malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.