Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31678307›Full record

Trial reportChest2020

A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of Three Guided Bronchoscopic Approaches for Investigating Pulmonary Nodules: The PRECISION-1 Study.

Lonny Yarmus, Jason Akulian, Momen Wahidi, Alex Chen, Jennifer P Steltz, Sam L Solomon, Diana Yu, Fabien Maldonado, Jose Cardenas-Garcia, Daniela Molena and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chest, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Oxymetazoline Can Shorten the Time Required for a Bronchoscope to Reach the Vocal Cords in Patients With Turbinate Hypertrophy.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Global trends and academic landscapes of ultrasound applications in lung cancer research: a bibliometric analysis (2000-2024).Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Lonny YarmusDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: lyarmus@jhmi.edu.
Jason AkulianDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Momen WahidiDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Alex ChenDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Washington University of St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Jennifer P SteltzDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Sam L SolomonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Diana YuDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Fabien MaldonadoDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Jose Cardenas-GarciaDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Daniela MolenaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Hans LeeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Anil VachaniDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, and the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center Philadelphia, PA.
Interventional Pulmonary Outcomes Group (IPOG)
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USDuke University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMichigan Medicine · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · USStanford University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USVanderbilt University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe capability of bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules (PPNs) remains limited. Despite decades of effort, evidence suggests that the diagnostic accuracy for electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (EMN) and radial endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) approach only 50%. New developments in robotic bronchoscopy (RB) may offer improvements in the assessment of PPNs.

methodsA prospective single-blinded randomized controlled comparative study to assess success in localization and puncture of PPNs, using an ultrathin bronchoscope with radial EBUS (UTB-rEBUS) vs EMN vs RB in a human cadaver model of PPNs < 2 cm, was performed. The primary end point was the ability to successfully localize and puncture the target nodule, verified by cone-beam CT comparing RB and EMN. Secondary end points included needle to target position "miss" distance, and UTB-rEBUS comparisons.

resultsSixty procedures were performed to target 20 PPNs over the study period. Implanted PPNs were distributed across all lobes, with 80% located within the lung periphery. The target PPN mean diameter was 16.5 ± 1.5 mm, with 50% noted to have a CT bronchus sign. The rate of successful PPN localization and puncture was superior when using RB, compared with EMN (80% vs 45%; P = .02). Among unsuccessful needle passes, the median needle to target "miss" distance was significantly different when comparing UTB-rEBUS, EMN, and RB (P = .0014).

conclusionsIn a cadaver model, use of RB significantly increased the ability to localize and successfully puncture small PPNs when compared with existing technologies. This study demonstrates the potential of RB to precisely reach, localize, and puncture small nodules in the periphery of the lung.

Indexed as

BronchoscopesBronchoscopyCadaverCone-Beam Computed TomographyElectromagnetic FieldsEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationEndosonographyHumansImage-Guided BiopsyRobotic Surgical ProceduresSingle-Blind MethodSolitary Pulmonary Noduleinterventional bronchoscopylung cancerlung nodulenavigational bronchoscopyrobotic bronchoscopy

Identifiers

PMID31678307
PMCPMC7534032
OpenAlexW2988394346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.