Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31678044›Full record

ArticleThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society2020

Correlation between NDI, PROMIS and SF-12 in cervical spine surgery.

Avani S Vaishnav, Catherine Himo Gang, Sravisht Iyer, Steven McAnany, Todd Albert, Sheeraz A Qureshi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Outcomes of cervical disc replacement in patients with neck pain greater than arm pain.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Avani S VaishnavHospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY, USA.
Catherine Himo GangHospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY, USA.
Sravisht IyerHospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 407 E 61st St, New York, NY, USA.
Steven McAnanyHospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 407 E 61st St, New York, NY, USA.
Todd AlbertHospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 407 E 61st St, New York, NY, USA.
Sheeraz A QureshiHospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 407 E 61st St, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: sheerazqureshimd@gmail.com.
Cornell University · USHospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background contextAs the focus in spine surgery has shifted from radiographic to patient-centric outcome, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are becoming increasingly important. They are linked to patient satisfaction, and are used to assess healthcare expenditure, determine compensation and evaluate cost-effectiveness. Thus, PROMs are important to various stakeholders, including patients, physicians, payers, and healthcare institutions. Thus, it is vital to establish methods to interpret and evaluate these outcome measures. PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between Neck Disability Index (NDI), Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) and Short Form-12 Physical Health Score (SF-12 PHS) in cervical spinal surgery in order to determine the validity of PROMIS-PF in these patients. STUDY DESIGN/

settingRetrospective review of prospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive patients who underwent cervical surgery for degenerative spinal pathology with a minimum of 3 months follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported measures that is, PROMs including NDI, PROMIS-PF, and SF-12 PHS.

methodsNo funding was received for this study. The authors report no relevant conflict of interest. PROM collected preoperatively and at each follow-up were analyzed using Pearson product-moment correlation.

resultsOf the 121 patients included, 66 underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, 42 cervical disc replacement, 13 posterior cervical decompression with or without fusion. A statistically significant improvement was achieved in all PROMs by 6 weeks and maintained at 1 year. Furthermore, the percentage of patients achieving an improvement greater than minimum clinically important difference was similar for NDI and PROMIS-PF, particularly at a follow-up of 3 months or more. A statistically significant negative correlation was seen between NDI and PROMIS-PF, which was moderate preoperatively and in the early postoperative period (r=-0.565 to -0.600), and strong at 3 months or longer follow-up (r=-0.622 to -0.705). A statistically significant, negative correlation was also seen between SF-12 PHS and NDI, which was moderate preoperatively and at 6 weeks (r=-0.5551 to -0.566); and strong at all other time-points (r=-0.678 to -0.749). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between SF-12 PHS and PROMIS-PF, which was strong to very-strong at all time-points (r=0.644-0.822), except at 2 weeks (r=0.570).

conclusionsAlthough NDI and SF-12 have been used for several years, PROMIS is a new outcome measure that is increasingly being implemented. The results of our study demonstrate the convergent and discriminant validity of PROMIS-PF, supported by the strong correlation between SF-12 PHS and PROMIS-PF at all time-points and the moderate correlation between NDI and PROMIS-PF preoperatively and in the early postoperative period, respectively. Thus, while PROMIS-PF may not be a good surrogate for disease-specific outcome measures, it may extend value as a precise and efficient general health tool.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeDiskectomyHumansMinimal Clinically Important DifferencePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRetrospective StudiesCervicalNDIPatient reported outcomesPROMIS-PFSF-12Spine surgery

Identifiers

PMID31678044
PMCPMC11620278
OpenAlexW2969577409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.