Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31677975›Full record

Observational studyJornal de pediatria

Transferrin isoelectric focusing for the investigation of congenital disorders of glycosylation: analysis of a ten-year experience in a Brazilian center.

Ana Paula Pereira Scholz de Magalhães, Maira Graeff Burin, Carolina Fischinger Moura de Souza, Fernanda Hendges de Bitencourt, Fernanda Medeiros Sebastião, Thiago Oliveira Silva, Filippo Pinto E Vairo, Ida Vanessa Doederlein Schwartz

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Jornal de pediatria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Missing heritability of Wilson disease: a search for the uncharacterized mutations.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Paula Pereira Scholz de MagalhãesUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Serviço de Genética Médica, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Maira Graeff BurinHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Serviço de Genética Médica, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Carolina Fischinger Moura de SouzaHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Serviço de Genética Médica, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Fernanda Hendges de BitencourtHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Serviço de Genética Médica, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Fernanda Medeiros SebastiãoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Serviço de Genética Médica, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Thiago Oliveira SilvaHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Serviço de Genética Médica, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Filippo Pinto E VairoMayo Clinic, Departament of Clinical Genomics, Rochester, United States; Mayo Clinic, Center for Individualized Medicine, Rochester, United States.
Ida Vanessa Doederlein SchwartzUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Serviço de Genética Médica, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Departamento de Genética, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Electronic address: ischwartz@hcpa.edu.br.
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo characterize cases of suspected congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) investigated in a laboratory in southern Brazil using the transferrin isoelectric focusing TfIEF test from 2008 to 2017.

methodObservational, cross-sectional, retrospective study. The laboratory records of 1,546 individuals (median age=36 months, 25-75 IQR=10-108; males=810) submitted to the TfIEF test during the period were reviewed.

resultsFifty-one individuals (3%) had an altered TfIEF pattern (5±2.8 cases/year; median age=24 months, 25-75 IQR=11-57 months; males=27, 53%). For 14 of them, data on diagnosis conclusion were available (classic galactosemia=4; hereditary fructose intolerance=4; peroxisomal diseases=2; PMM2-CDG=2; MPDU1-CDG=1; SLC35A2-CDG=1).Comparing the cases with the normal and altered TfIEF patterns, there was a higher prevalence of altered cases in the age group from 11 months to 3 years. There was an increase in the likelihood of change in TfIEF, especially in the presence of inverted nipples or liver disease.

conclusionsThe data suggest that the investigation of a case with suspected CDG is a complex problem, being aggravated by the existence of other IEMs (inborn errors of metabolism) associated with altered TfIEF pattern and lack of access to confirmatory tests. The presence of inverted nipples and liver disease, especially in individuals aged 11 months to 3 years, should suggest the need for TfIEF investigation.

Indexed as

Congenital Disorders of GlycosylationIsoelectric FocusingTransferrinBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInfantRetrospective StudiesTransferrinCongenital disorders of glycosylationDoenças congênitas da glicosilaçãoIsoelectric focusingIsoeletrofocalizaçãoScreeningTransferrinTransferrinaTriagem

Identifiers

PMID31677975
PMCPMC9432258
OpenAlexW2988879694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.