ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2019
Event-related potentials following contraction of respiratory muscles in pre-term and full-term infants.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Co-developing sleep-wake and sensory foundations for cognition in the human fetus and newborn.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025Review
- Decoding of pain during heel lancing in human neonates with EEG signal and machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The effect of acute respiratory events and respiratory stimulants on EEG-recorded brain activity in neonates: A systematic review.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2023Review
- Spontaneous and apnea arousals from sleep in preterm infants.Pediatric research · 2021Article
- Long-range temporal organisation of limb movement kinematics in human neonates.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Reinstatement · 2019-10-15Date of Article and/or Notice Unknown · Notice - Limited or No Information · Retract and Replace · Temporary Removal · Removed · · removal on unknown date, html page overwrite; article reinstated on unknown date with no reason provided (1/26/22 AJA)
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveInvoluntary isolated body movements are prominent in pre-term and full-term infants. Proprioceptive and tactile afferent feedback following limb muscle contractions is associated with somatotopic EEG responses. Involuntary contractions of respiratory muscles, primarily the diaphragm - hiccups - are also frequent throughout the human perinatal period during active behavioural states. Here we tested whether diaphragm contraction provides afferent input to the developing brain, as following limb muscle contraction.
methodsIn 13 infants on the neonatal ward (30-42 weeks corrected gestational age), we analysed EEG activity (18-electrode recordings in six subjects; 17-electrode recordings in five subjects; 16-electrode recordings in two subjects), time-locked to diaphragm contractions (n = 1316) recorded with a movement transducer affixed to the trunk.
resultsAll bouts of hiccups occurred during wakefulness or active sleep. Each diaphragm contraction evoked two initial event-related potentials with negativity predominantly across the central region, and a third event-related potential with positivity maximal across the central region.
conclusionsInvoluntary contraction of the diaphragm can be encoded by the brain from as early as ten weeks prior to the average time of birth. SIGNIFICANCE: Hiccups - frequently observed in neonates - can provide afferent input to developing sensory cortices in pre-term and full-term infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.