Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31677343›Full record

ReviewJournal of diabetes investigation2020

Lumos for the long trail: Strategies for clinical diagnosis and severity staging for diabetic polyneuropathy and future directions.

Tatsuhito Himeno, Hideki Kamiya, Jiro Nakamura

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07000214 (Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation With Balance Training to Decrease Fall Risks in Older Patients With Diabetic Polyneuropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07000214 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation With Balance Training to Decrease Fall Risks in Older Patients With Diabetic Polyneuropathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, ThailandRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsDiabetic PolyneuropathyArmsPeripheral magnetic stimulation, Balance training, Sham stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tatsuhito HimenoDivision of Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5677-1125
Hideki KamiyaDivision of Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan.
Jiro NakamuraDivision of Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan.
Aichi Medical University · JP

Funding

Aichi Medical University AikeikaiJapan Association for Diabetes Education and CareJapan Diabetes FoundationKenzo Suzuki Memorial Medical Science Research FoundationManpei Suzuki Diabetes FoundationMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 15H06720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic polyneuropathy, which is a chronic symmetrical length-dependent sensorimotor polyneuropathy, is the most common form of diabetic neuropathy. Although diabetic polyneuropathy is the most important risk factor in cases of diabetic foot, given its poor prognosis, the criteria for diagnosis and staging of diabetic polyneuropathy has not been established; consequently, no disease-modifying treatment is available. Most criteria and scoring systems that were previously proposed consist of clinical signs, symptoms and quantitative examinations, including sensory function tests and nerve conduction study. However, in diabetic polyneuropathy, clinical symptoms, including numbness, pain and allodynia, show no significant correlation with the development of pathophysiological changes in the peripheral nervous system. Therefore, these proposed criteria and scoring systems have failed to become a universal clinical end-point for large-scale clinical trials evaluating the prognosis in diabetes patients. We should use quantitative examinations of which validity has been proven. Nerve conduction study, for example, has been proven effective to evaluate dysfunctions of large nerve fibers. Baba's classification, which uses a nerve conduction study, is one of the most promising diagnostic methods. Loss of small nerve fibers can be determined using corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fiber density. However, no staging criteria have been proposed using these quantitative evaluations for small fiber neuropathy. To establish a novel diagnostic and staging criteria of diabetic polyneuropathy, we propose three principles to be considered: (i) include only generalizable objective quantitative tests; (ii) exclude clinical symptoms and signs; and (iii) do not restrictively exclude other causes of polyneuropathy.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexDiabetic NeuropathiesHumansBaba’s classificationDiabetic polyneuropathyDPNCheck

Identifiers

PMID31677343
PMCPMC6944828
OpenAlexW2984748146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.