Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31677308›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020

RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants in open-bore vertical MRI systems: A simulation study with realistic device configurations.

Laleh Golestanirad, Ehsan Kazemivalipour, David Lampman, Hideta Habara, Ergin Atalar, Joshua Rosenow, Julie Pilitsis, John Kirsch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. MRI and Implant Safety at Low-Field and Ultralow-Field Strengths.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Low-field MRI's Spark on Implant Safety: A Closer Look at Radiofrequency Heating.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  6. Rapid prediction of MRI-induced RF heating of active implantable medical devices using machine learning.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Safety of MRI in patients with retained cardiac leads.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Predicting RF Heating of Conductive Leads During Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 T: A Machine Learning ApproachAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants during MRI in 1.2 T vertical scanners versus 1.5 T horizontal systems: A simulation study with realistic lead configurations.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2020
    Article
  18. Evaluating Accuracy of Numerical Simulations in Predicting Heating of Wire Implants During MRI at 1.5 T.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2020
    Article
  19. Device Configuration and Patient's Body Composition Significantly Affect RF Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants During MRI: An Experimental Study at 1.5T and 3T.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2020
    Article
  20. Effect of Biophysical Model Complexity on Predictions of Volume of Tissue Activated (VTA) during Deep Brain Stimulation.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Laleh GolestaniradDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-6114
Ehsan KazemivalipourDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
David LampmanHitachi Healthcare Americas, Twinsburg, Ohio.
Hideta HabaraHitachi, Ltd. Healthcare Business Unit, Tokyo, Japan.
Ergin AtalarDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Joshua RosenowDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Julie PilitsisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.
John KirschA.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Northwestern University · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · USBilkent University · TRHitachi (Japan) · JPMassachusetts General Hospital · USTokyo Health Care University · JP

Funding

Patient-adjustable MRI technology for high-resolution imaging of deep brain stimulationR00EB021320 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLESTANI RAD, LALEH · 2018 to 2020
$733k
Computational methodologies for safety assessment of MRI in patients with deep brain stimulation implantsR03EB024705 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLESTANI RAD, LALEH · 2017 to 2018
$165k
Safety assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with retained cardiac leadsR03EB025344 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLESTANI RAD, LALEH · 2018 to 2019
$156k
NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB021320NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB024705NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB025344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) implants benefit highly from MRI, however, access to MRI is restricted for these patients because of safety hazards associated with RF heating of the implant. To date, all MRI studies on RF heating of medical implants have been performed in horizontal closed-bore systems. Vertical MRI scanners have a fundamentally different distribution of electric and magnetic fields and are now available at 1.2T, capable of high-resolution structural and functional MRI. This work presents the first simulation study of RF heating of DBS implants in high-field vertical scanners.

methodsWe performed finite element electromagnetic simulations to calculate specific absorption rate (SAR) at tips of DBS leads during MRI in a commercially available 1.2T vertical coil compared to a 1.5T horizontal scanner. Both isolated leads and fully implanted systems were included.

resultsWe found 10- to 30-fold reduction in SAR implication at tips of isolated DBS leads, and up to 19-fold SAR reduction at tips of leads in fully implanted systems in vertical coils compared to horizontal birdcage coils.

conclusionsIf confirmed in larger patient cohorts and verified experimentally, this result can open the door to plethora of structural and functional MRI applications to guide, interpret, and advance DBS therapy.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationHeatingComputer SimulationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, ImagingProstheses and ImplantsRadio Wavesdeep brain stimulationfinite element method (FEM)interventional MRImedical implantsMR-guided neurosurgeryMRI safetyopen-bore MRIRF heatingvertical MRI

Identifiers

PMID31677308
PMCPMC7047541
OpenAlexW2983480092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.