ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020
A Gradient Boosting Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Mortality in the Emergency Department Triage: Devising a Nine-Point Triage Score.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Revolutionizing sepsis diagnosis using machine learning and deep learning models: a systematic literature review.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of artificial intelligence predicting emergency department dispositions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Improving triage performance in emergency departments using machine learning and natural language processing: a systematic review.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Influence of artificial intelligence on the work design of emergency department clinicians a systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2022Pooled it
- Machine learning techniques for mortality prediction in emergency departments: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- The Use of Machine Learning in Emergency Care Units: A Systematic Review.Journal of primary care & community healthPooled it
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Developing and validating an artificial intelligence-based electronic triage model for predicting clinical outcomes among cardiac-suspected patients in the emergency department.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Comparative performance of manual triage systems and ML models in predicting clinical outcomes among patients transported to the emergency department by emergency medical services.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-powered tiered early warning framework addressing high false alarm rates for in-hospital mortality prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based mortality prediction models for emergency department patients: a comparative analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based approaches for advance care planning: a scoping review.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- A Machine Learning System to Automate Body Computed Tomography Protocoling.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Ethical considerations on the role of artificial intelligence in defining the futility in emergency surgery.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
- Explainable AI for enhanced accuracy in malaria diagnosis using ensemble machine learning models.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Fast and interpretable mortality risk scores for critical care patients.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Comparing Single-Hospital and National Models to Predict 30-Day Inpatient Mortality.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Improving musculoskeletal care with AI enhanced triage through data driven screening of referral letters.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The Scoring Model to Predict ICU Stay and Mortality After Emergency Admissions in Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Study of 30 366 Patients.Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency departments (ED) are becoming increasingly overwhelmed, increasing poor outcomes. Triage scores aim to optimize the waiting time and prioritize the resource usage. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms offer advantages for creating predictive clinical applications.
objectiveEvaluate a state-of-the-art machine learning model for predicting mortality at the triage level and, by validating this automatic tool, improve the categorization of patients in the ED.
designAn institutional review board (IRB) approval was granted for this retrospective study. Information of consecutive adult patients (ages 18-100) admitted at the emergency department (ED) of one hospital were retrieved (January 1, 2012-December 31, 2018). Features included the following: demographics, admission date, arrival mode, referral code, chief complaint, previous ED visits, previous hospitalizations, comorbidities, home medications, vital signs, and Emergency Severity Index (ESI). The following outcomes were evaluated: early mortality (up to 2 days post ED registration) and short-term mortality (2-30 days post ED registration). A gradient boosting model was trained on data from years 2012-2017 and examined on data from the final year (2018). The area under the curve (AUC) for mortality prediction was used as an outcome metric. Single-variable analysis was conducted to develop a nine-point triage score for early mortality. KEY
resultsOverall, 799,522 ED visits were available for analysis. The early and short-term mortality rates were 0.6% and 2.5%, respectively. Models trained on the full set of features yielded an AUC of 0.962 for early mortality and 0.923 for short-term mortality. A model that utilized the nine features with the highest single-variable AUC scores (age, arrival mode, chief complaint, five primary vital signs, and ESI) yielded an AUC of 0.962 for early mortality.
conclusionThe gradient boosting model shows high predictive ability for screening patients at risk of early mortality utilizing data available at the time of triage in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.