ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2019
Ion-Ion Interactions in Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-Ion Mass Spectrometry for Heterogeneous and High Molecular Weight Samples.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024Review
- Multiple Ion Charge Extraction (MICE) for High-Throughput Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Electrostatic Linear Ion Trap Optimization Strategy for High Resolution Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2023Article
- Dynamic Energy Measurements in Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry Eliminate Adverse Effects of Ion-Ion Interactions.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Applications of Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Approaches to Heterogeneity in Native Mass Spectrometry.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Higher Resolution Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Dramatic Improvement in Sensitivity with Pulsed Mode Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Charge detection mass spectrometry (CDMS) is a single-particle technique where the masses of individual ions are determined by simultaneously measuring their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) and charge. Ions are usually trapped inside an electrostatic linear ion trap (ELIT) where they oscillate back and forth through a detection cylinder, generating a periodic signal that is analyzed by fast Fourier transforms. The oscillation frequency is related to the ion's m/z, and the magnitude is related to the ion's charge. In early work, multiple ion trapping events were discarded because there was a question about whether ion-ion interactions affected the results. Here, we report trajectory calculations performed to assess the influence of ion-ion interactions when multiple highly charged ions are simultaneously trapped in an ELIT. Ion-ion interactions cause trajectory and energy fluctuations that lead to variations in the oscillation frequencies that in turn degrade the precision and accuracy of the m/z measurements. The peak shapes acquire substantial high and low m/z tails, and the average m/z shifts to a higher value as the number of trapped ions increases. The effects of the ion-ion interactions are proportional to the product of the charges and the square root of the number of trapped ions and depend on the ions' m/z distribution. For the ELIT design examined here, ion-ion interactions limit the m/z resolving power to several hundred for a typical homogeneous ion population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.