Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31677042›Full record

Trial reportActa neurologica Belgica2021

The efficacy comparison of classic ketogenic diet and modified Atkins diet in children with refractory epilepsy: a clinical trial.

Bita Poorshiri, Mohammad Barzegar, Sanaz Tahmasebi, Shadi Shiva, Sina Raeisi, Zakiyeh Ebadi

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bita PoorshiriPediatric Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mohammad BarzegarPediatric Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. mm_barzegar@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5503-9039
Sanaz TahmasebiPediatric Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Shadi ShivaPediatric Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Sina RaeisiPediatric Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Zakiyeh EbadiPediatric Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary therapy has an important role in the therapeutic process in children suffering refractory epilepsy. There are two kinds of dietary therapy which are the most common in children with refractory epilepsy: The classic ketogenic diet (KD) and the modified Atkins diet (MAD). The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and compliance of these two dietary therapies in the children who have refractory epilepsy during 6 months of treatment. From March 2017 to November 2018, 45 children aged 2-15 years who had refractory epilepsy were randomly allocated in KD or MAD group. The intervention period was 6 months in both groups. The frequencies of seizures were determined from parental reports and were compared between the groups. The patients with upper than 50% reduction in seizure frequency were deemed as responders to the diets. Twenty-four patients were assigned to the KD and 11 patients to the MAD. Overall, 45.8% of children treated with the KD and 45.5% of children treated with MAD had over than 50% response to the diet therapies. The difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.437). The MAD was more advantageous regarding better tolerability and fewer side effects. There is not much difference regarding the efficacy between the MAD and classic KD. The MAD with fewer side effects may be more suitable as the first line of dietary therapy in children with refractory epilepsy.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDiet, High-Protein Low-CarbohydrateDiet, KetogenicDrug Resistant EpilepsyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeAntiepileptic drugsClassic ketogenic dietEpilepsyModified Atkins diet

Identifiers

PMID31677042
OpenAlexW2988051619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.