Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31677041›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2019

Effective Identification of Lynch Syndrome in Gastroenterology Practice.

Charles Muller, Lindsay Matthews, Sonia S Kupfer, Jennifer M Weiss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Instability in the Penta-C and Penta-D Loci in Microsatellite-Unstable Endometrial Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charles MullerSection of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Lindsay MatthewsDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Sonia S KupferSection of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jennifer M WeissDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. jmw@medicine.wisc.edu.

Funding

Colonic responses to vitamin D and aspirin in African- and European-AmericansR01CA220329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KUPFER, SONIA · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIdentification of Lynch syndrome is important from an individual patient and public health standpoint. As paradigms for Lynch syndrome diagnosis have shifted in recent years, this review will discuss rationale and limitations for current strategies as well as provide an overview of future directions in the field. RECENT

findingsIn recent years, the use of clinical criteria and risk scores for identification of Lynch syndrome has been augmented by universal testing of all newly diagnosed colorectal cancers with molecular methods to screen for mismatch repair deficiency with high sensitivity and specificity. Studies of implementation and outcomes of universal testing in clinical practice have demonstrated significant heterogeneity that results in suboptimal uptake and contributes to disparities in diagnosis. Emerging technologies, such as next-generation sequencing, hold significant promise as a screening strategy for Lynch syndrome. Universal testing for Lynch syndrome is being performed with increasing frequency, although real-world outcomes have demonstrated room for improvement. Future directions in Lynch syndrome diagnosis will involve optimization of universal testing workflow and application of new genetics technologies.

Indexed as

Amsterdam CriteriaBethesda GuidelinesLynch syndromePREMM ModelUniversal Tumor Screening

Identifiers

PMID31677041
PMCPMC6986345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.