ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2019
Surgical and radiosurgical treatment strategies for Cushing's disease.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- An individualized approach to the management of Cushing disease.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2023Review
- Pilot study to define criteria for Pituitary Tumors Centers of Excellence (PTCOE): results of an audit of leading international centers.Pituitary · 2023Article
- Remission, complications, and overall survival in transsphenoidal pituitary surgery-a Swedish single-center experience of 578 patients.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
- Low but not undetectable early postoperative nadir serum cortisol predicts sustained remission in Cushing's disease.Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2022Article
- First-line surgery in prolactinomas: lessons from a long-term follow-up study in a tertiary referral center.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCushing's disease (CD) is rare disorder that should be adequately managed to optimize long-term prognosis. Treatment of CD is multidisciplinary and often includes surgical resection, adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and medical treatment. Here we review surgical and radiosurgical treatment strategies for ACTH producing pituitary adenomas.
methodsA comprehensive literature review was carried out to review remission and recurrence rates, and complications of surgical and SRS treatments of ACTH producing pituitary adenomas.
resultsSurgical resection plays a central role in the management of ACTH secreting pituitary adenomas and usually allows rapid endocrine remission that ranges from 69 to 90%. The most common complications after resection include some degree of new hypopituitarism, diabetes insipidus and CSF leak. Devastating complications, such as injury of vascular and neural structures, are very rare. Surgeon experience and adequate pre-operative imaging are important for safe and successful surgery. Endocrine recurrence rates after resection range from 9 to 30%. SRS is often employed for incompletely resected adenomas. Endocrine remission after SRS ranges from 35 to 72%. The most common complication of SRS is new anterior pituitary gland deficiency. Recurrence rates after GKRS range from 18 to 24%.
conclusionsTranssphenoidal resection of ACTH producing pituitary adenoma is a safe and highly effective procedure for CD in experienced hands. Radiosurgery is more frequently used as treatment of residual and recurrent adenoma and persistent CD. Long-term endocrine and imaging follow-up is important as delayed recurrences and hypopituitarism are not infrequent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.