Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31677018›Full record

ReviewRadiation and environmental biophysics2020

Dose limits for occupational exposure to ionising radiation and genotoxic carcinogens: a German perspective.

Werner Rühm, Joachim Breckow, Günter Dietze, Anna Friedl, Rüdiger Greinert, Peter Jacob, Stephan Kistinger, Rolf Michel, Wolfgang-Ulrich Müller, Heinz Otten and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Do we really need the "detriment" for radiation protection?Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Werner RühmHelmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Therapy, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany. werner.ruehm@helmholtz-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6354-7359
Joachim BreckowTechnische Hochschule Mittelhessen, Gießen, Germany.
Günter DietzePhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany.
Anna FriedlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Rüdiger GreinertElbekliniken, Stade/Buxtehude, Germany.
Peter JacobHelmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Stephan KistingerBrenk Systemplanung GmbH, Aachen, Germany.
Rolf MichelUniversität Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Wolfgang-Ulrich MüllerUniversitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
Heinz OttenDeutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung, Berlin, Germany.
Christian StrefferUniversitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
Wolfgang WeissBundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Neuherberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper summarises the view of the German Commission on Radiological Protection ("Strahlenschutzkommission", SSK) on the rationale behind the currently valid dose limits and dose constraints for workers recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The paper includes a discussion of the reasoning behind current dose limits followed by a discussion of the detriment used by ICRP as a measure for stochastic health effects. Studies on radiation-induced cancer are reviewed because this endpoint represents the most important contribution to detriment. Recent findings on radiation-induced circulatory disease that are currently not included in detriment calculation are also reviewed. It appeared that for detriment calculations the contribution of circulatory diseases plays only a secondary role, although the uncertainties involved in their risk estimates are considerable. These discussions are complemented by a review of the procedures currently in use in Germany, or in discussion elsewhere, to define limits for genotoxic carcinogens. To put these concepts in perspective, actual occupational radiation exposures are exemplified with data from Germany, for the year 2012, and regulations in Germany are compared to the recommendations issued by ICRP. Conclusions include, among others, considerations on radiation protection concepts currently in use and recommendations of the SSK on the limitation of annual effective dose and effective dose cumulated over a whole working life.

Indexed as

CarcinogensRadiation DosageRadiation, IonizingAnimalsGermanyHumansOccupational ExposureRadiation ExposureRadiation ProtectionCarcinogensDose limitsGenotoxic carcinogensIonising radiationRadiation protection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.