Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31677013›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2020

Cardiac intensive care management of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention using the venoarterial ECMO support.

Marco Zuin, Gianluca Rigatelli, Ramesh Daggubati

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marco ZuinFaculty of Medicine, Section of Internal and Cardiopulmonary Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Gianluca RigatelliCardiovascular Diagnosis and Endoluminal Interventions Unit, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy. jackyheart71@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7318-3640
Ramesh DaggubatiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, USA.
Institute for Diagnosis and Animal Health · ROUniversity of Ferrara · ITWinthrop-University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emerging concept of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) has required the adoption of a multidisciplinary team approach. Venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) has been introduced as a temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for HR-PCI patients in order to provide an adequate systemic perfusion during the procedure. Both patient's complexity and technological evolutions have catalyzed the development of critical care cardiology; however, ECMO therapy faces several challenges. Indeed, the management of patients on ECMO remains complex; moreover, the lack of specific recommendation for HR-PCI patients further complicates the management of these patients. In this narrative review, we give a reappraisal for the management of HR-PCI patients supported with VA-ECMO according to the available data published in current literature.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeCritical CareExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHumansPercutaneous Coronary InterventionCritical careHemodynamic monitoringHigh-risk PCIIntensive care unitMechanical circulatory supportShockVA-ECMO

Identifiers

PMID31677013
OpenAlexW2983051750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.