Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31676961›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2020

Differentiation of pilocytic and pilomyxoid astrocytomas using dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion and diffusion weighted imaging.

Chang Y Ho, Nucharin Supakul, Parth U Patel, Vetana Seit, Michael Groswald, Jeremy Cardinal, Chen Lin, Stephen F Kralik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hypothalamic Pilomyxoid Astrocytoma in a Child with Lipodystrophy.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chang Y HoDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, MRI Department, Indiana University School of Medicine, 705 Riley Hospital Drive, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. cyho@iupui.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2358-1851
Nucharin SupakulDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, MRI Department, Indiana University School of Medicine, 705 Riley Hospital Drive, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Parth U PatelIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Vetana SeitDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, MRI Department, Indiana University School of Medicine, 705 Riley Hospital Drive, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Michael GroswaldIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Jeremy CardinalDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, MRI Department, Indiana University School of Medicine, 705 Riley Hospital Drive, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Chen LinDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, MRI Department, Indiana University School of Medicine, 705 Riley Hospital Drive, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Stephen F KralikDepartment of Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, USA.
Indiana University School of MedicineIndiana University Hospital · USTexas Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePilocytic (PA) and pilomyxoid astrocytomas (PMA) are related low-grade tumors which occur predominantly in children. PMAs have a predilection for a supratentorial location in younger children with worse outcomes. However, the two have similar imaging characteristics. Quantitative MR sequences such as dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion and diffusion (DWI) were assessed for significant differences between the two tumor types and locations.

methodsA retrospective search for MRI with DSC and DWI on pathology-proven cases of PMA and PA in children was performed. Tumors were manually segmented on anatomic images registered to rCBV, K2, and ADC maps. Tumors were categorized as PA or PMA, with subclassification of supratentorial and infratentorial locations. Mean values were obtained for tumor groups and locations compared with Student's t test for significant differences with post hoc correction for multiple comparisons. ROC analysis for significant t test values was performed. Histogram evaluation was also performed.

resultsA total of 49 patients met inclusion criteria. This included 30 patients with infratentorial PA, 8 with supratentorial PA, 6 with supratentorial PMA, and 5 with infratentorial PMA. Mean analysis showed significantly increased rCBV for infratentorial PMA (2.39 ± 1.1) vs PA (1.39 ± 0.16, p = 0.0006). ROC analysis for infratentorial PA vs PMA yielded AUC = 0.87 (p < 0.001). Histogram analysis also demonstrated a higher ADC peak location for PMA (1.8 ± 0.2) vs PA (1.56 ± 0.28).

conclusionPMA has a significantly higher rCBV than PA in the infratentorial space. DSC perfusion and diffusion MR imaging may be helpful to distinguish between the two tumor types in this location.

Indexed as

AdolescentAstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaApparent diffusion coefficientDiffusion weighted imagingDynamic susceptibility contrastPerfusion imagingPilocytic astrocytomaPilomyxoid astrocytoma

Identifiers

PMID31676961
OpenAlexW2988398931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.