ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2020
Comparing directly measured versus mathematically calculated free serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level in children.
Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction25-Hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) is essential for calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. The majority of serum 25(OH)D is bound to vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP) (~ 85%) and to albumin (~ 15%), with only a miniscule amount circulating as free 25(OH)D. Free 25(OH)D can be calculated mathematically by Bikle method from the concentrations of total 25(OH)D, VDBP, and albumin or measured directly by ELISA. A direct head-to-head comparison between the two methods has not been done in children. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe objective of the study was to compare the mathematically calculated versus directly measured free 25(OH) vitamin D in children. Serum samples from 74 children (ages 1-19 years) were simultaneously analyzed for total 25(OH)D, serum albumin, VDBP, and free 25(OH)D. Pearson correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plot were used to evaluate agreement between the two methods.
resultsThe mean age was 9.1 ± 5.1 years, with 61% boys, 76% Caucasians, and 24% African-Americans. The mean ± SD for total 25(OH)D was 38.7 ± 12.8 ng/mL, bioavailable 25(OH)D 3.1 ± 1.1 ng/mL, mathematically calculated free 25(OH)D 8.4 ± 3.2 pg/mL, and directly measured free 25(OH)D 8.9 ± 3.6 pg/mL. Pearson correlation reflected a significant correlation between mathematically calculated and directly measured free 25(OH)D (r = 0.66, p < 0.0005). Bland-Altman plot reflected a tight agreement within a 95% limit of agreement (mean = - 0.026 ± 2SD).
conclusionsThe directly measured and mathematically calculated free 25(OH)D are in close agreement and are interchangeable. Depending on the local availability of instruments and methods, free 25(OH)D can be either directly measured or mathematically calculated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.