Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31676898›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2020

Effects of a Community-to-Clinic Navigation Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Underserved People.

Usha Menon, Laura A Szalacha, Jennifer Kue, Patricia M Herman, Julie Bucho-Gonzalez, Peter Lance, Linda Larkey

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Usha MenonUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Laura A SzalachaUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jennifer KueThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Patricia M HermanRand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Julie Bucho-GonzalezArizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Peter LanceUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Linda LarkeyArizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Arizona State University · USUniversity of South Florida · USRAND Corporation · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Navigation from Community to Clinic to promote CRC Screening in Underserved PopulR01CA162393 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI LARKEY, LINDA K, MENON, USHA · 2012 to 2016
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA162393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer screening remains suboptimal among poor and underserved people. PURPOSE: We tested the effectiveness of a community-to-clinic navigator intervention to guide multicultural, underinsured individuals into primary care clinics to complete colorectal cancer screening.

methodsThis two-phase behavioral intervention study was conducted in Phoenix, Arizona (2012-2018). Community sites were randomized to group education or group education plus tailored navigation to increase attendance at primary care clinics (Phase I). Individuals who completed a clinic appointment received the tailored navigation in person or via phone (Phase II).

resultsIn Phase I (N = 345), 37.9% of the intervention group scheduled a clinic appointment versus 19.4% of the comparison group. In Phase II, 26.5% of the original intervention group were screened versus only 10.4% of the original comparison group. Those in the intervention group were 3.84 times more likely to be screened than were those in the comparison group (odds ratio = 3.84; 95% confidence interval = 1.81-6.92).

conclusionsTranslation of an efficacious tailored navigation intervention for colorectal cancer screening to a community-to-clinic context is associated with significantly increased rates of colorectal cancer screening. Navigation assistance to address barriers to screening may serve as the most important component of any educational program to increase individual adherence to colorectal cancer screening.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerImplementation ScienceProcess Assessment, Health CareAgedArizonaColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth PromotionHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedPatient NavigationProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationCancer screeningColorectal cancerImplementation sciencePatient navigation

Identifiers

PMID31676898
PMCPMC7168576
OpenAlexW2983487258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.