Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31676895›Full record

Trial reportDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2020

Association between time interval from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to surgery and complete histological tumor response in esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: a national cohort study.

F Klevebro, K Nilsson, M Lindblad, S Ekman, J Johansson, L Lundell, N Ndegwa, J Hedberg, M Nilsson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06364566 (Exploring the Optimal Timing of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06364566 nacompletednot on this map

Exploring the Optimal Timing of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2010 to 2019Enrolled303ConditionsTimeArmsNeoadjuvant chemradiotherapy, Minimally invasive esophagectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Considerations for Care of the Cancer Patient.International anesthesiology clinics · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

F KlevebroDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
K NilssonDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
M LindbladDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
S EkmanDepartment of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
J JohanssonDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden.
L LundellDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
N NdegwaDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
J HedbergDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
M NilssonDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, and Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SESkåne University Hospital · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal time interval from neoadjuvant therapy to surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate if a prolonged interval between completed neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery was associated with improved histological response rates and survival in a population-based national register cohort. The population-based cohort study included patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy due to cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Patients were divided into two groups based on the median time from completed neoadjuvant treatment to surgery. The primary outcome was complete histological response. Secondary outcomes were lymph node tumor response, postoperative complications, R0 resection rate, 90-day mortality, and overall survival. In total, 643 patients were included, 344 (54%) patients underwent surgery within 49 days, and 299 (47%) after 50 days or longer. The groups were similar concerning baseline characteristics except for a higher clinical tumor stage (P = 0.009) in the prolonged time to surgery group. There were no significant differences in complete histological response, R0 resection rate, postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, or overall survival. Adjusted odds ratio for ypT0 in the prolonged time to surgery group was 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.64-1.53). Complete histological response in the primary tumor (ypT0) was associated with significantly higher overall survival: adjusted hazard ratio: 0.55 (95% CI 0.41-0.76). If lymph node metastases were present in these patients, the survival was, however, significantly lower: adjusted hazard ratio for ypT0N1: 2.30 (95% CI 1.21-4.35). In this prospectively collected, nationwide cohort study of esophageal and junctional type 1 and 2 cancer patients, there were no associations between time to surgery and histological complete response, postoperative outcomes, or overall survival. The results suggest that it is safe for patients to postpone surgery at least 7 to 10 weeks after completed chemoradiotherapy, but no evidence was seen in favor of recommending a prolonged time to surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. A definitive answer to this question requires a randomized controlled trial of standard vs. prolonged time to surgery.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyChemoradiotherapyCohort StudiesEsophagectomyEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyTreatment Outcomeesophageal cancerhistological complete responseneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapypostoperative complicationsurvivaltiming of surgery

Identifiers

PMID31676895
PMCPMC7203996
OpenAlexW2987392201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.