Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31676719›Full record

Trial reportThorax2020

Delivery of long-term-injectable agents for TB by lay carers: pragmatic randomised trial.

Danielle B Cohen, Kuzani Mbendera, Hendramoorthy Maheswaran, Mavuto Mukaka, Helen Mangochi, Linna Phiri, Jason Madan, Geraint Davies, Elizabeth Corbett, Bertel Squire

Abstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thorax, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Cost-Effectiveness of Homecare Services for Adults and Older Adults: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Development of a Layperson Injector Training for the Home-Based Administration of Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapies for Persons With HIV.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Danielle B CohenInfection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK Danielle.Cohen@sheffield.ac.uk.
Kuzani MbenderaMalawi National TB Programme, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Hendramoorthy MaheswaranClinical Department, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Mavuto MukakaClinical Department, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Helen MangochiClinical Department, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Linna PhiriClinical Department, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Jason MadanDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
Geraint DaviesClinical Department, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Elizabeth CorbettClinical Department, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Bertel SquireDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 200901/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with recurrent or drug-resistant TB require long courses of intramuscular injections. We evaluate a novel system in which patient-nominated lay carers were trained to deliver intramuscular injections to patients in their own homes.

methodsA pragmatic, individually randomised non-inferiority trial was conducted at two hospitals in Malawi. Adults starting TB retreatment were recruited. Patients randomised to the intervention received home-based care from patient-nominated lay people trained to deliver intramuscular streptomycin. Patients receiving standard care were admitted to hospital for 2 months of streptomycin. The primary outcome was successful treatment (alive and on treatment) at the end of the intervention.

resultsOf 456 patients screened, 204 participants were randomised. The trial was terminated early due to futility. At the end of the intervention, 97/101 (96.0%) in the hospital arm were still alive and on treatment compared with 96/103 (93.2%) in the home-based arm (risk difference -0.03 (95% CI -0.09 to 0.03); p value 0.538). There were no differences in the proportion completing 8 months of anti-TB treatment; or the proportion experiencing 2-month sputum culture conversion. The mean cost of hospital-based management was US$1546.3 per person, compared to US$729.2 for home-based management. Home-based care reduced risk of catastrophic household costs by 84%.

conclusionsAlthough this trial failed to meet target recruitment, the available data demonstrate that training patient-nominated lay people has potential to provide a feasible solution to the operational challenges associated with delivering long-term-injectable drugs to people with recurrent or drug-resistant TB in resource-limited settings, and substantially reduce costs. Further data under operational conditions are required. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN05815615.

Indexed as

CaregiversHome NursingAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntitubercular AgentsFemaleHumansInjections, IntramuscularMalawiMaleStreptomycinTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntitubercular AgentsStreptomycincatastrophic household costscommunity-based caredrug-resistant TBOPATrecurrent TBretreatment TBstreptomycin

Identifiers

PMID31676719
PMCPMC6929921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.