Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31676661›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Prognostic factors for relapse in patients with clinical stage I testicular cancer: protocol for a Danish nationwide cohort study.

Thomas Wagner, Birgitte Grønkær Toft, Birte Engvad, Jakob Lauritsen, Michael Kreiberg, Mikkel Bandak, Josephine Rosenvilde, Ib Jarle Christensen, Anette Pedersen Pilt, Daniel Berney and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Pathological predictors of metastatic disease in testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: which tumor-node-metastasis staging system?Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thomas WagnerDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark thomas.wagner.nielsen@regionh.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-0256-0074
Birgitte Grønkær ToftDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Birte EngvadDepartment of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jakob LauritsenDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael KreibergDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel BandakDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Josephine RosenvildeDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ib Jarle ChristensenGastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Anette Pedersen PiltDepartment of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Daniel BerneyDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Gedske DaugaardDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionApproximately one-fourth of patients with clinical stage I testicular germ cell cancer will relapse within 5 years of follow-up. Certain histopathological features in the primary tumour have been associated with an increased risk of relapse. The available evidence on the prognostic value of the risk factors, however, is hampered by heterogeneity of the study populations included and variable reporting of the histopathological features. The aim of this study is to identify pathological risk factors for relapse in an unselected large nationwide cohort of patients with stage I disease. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: All incident cases of stage I testicular germ cell cancer diagnosed in Denmark between 2013 and 2018 will be identified using the nationwide prospective Danish Testicular Cancer (DaTeCa) database. Archived microscopic slides from the orchiectomy specimens will be retrieved through linkage to the Danish Pathology Data Bank and reviewed blinded to the clinical outcome. The DaTeCa database includes 960 stage I seminoma patients with expected 185 relapses and 480 patients with stage I non-seminoma with expected 150 relapses. A minimum follow-up period of 3 years of all patients will be ensured. Predefined prognostic variables will be investigated with regard to relapse in univariable and multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committee (Region Zealand, Denmark) and the Danish Data Protection Agency. All data will be managed confidentially according to legislation. Study results will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-review journals.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualDenmarkHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingOrchiectomyPrognosisProspective StudiesResearch DesignRisk FactorsSeminomaSurvival AnalysisTesticular Neoplasmsclinical stage Inonseminomatous germ cell tumourrecurrencerisk factorsseminoma

Identifiers

PMID31676661
PMCPMC6830695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.