Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31676656›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

LeiKA: an optional German general practice teaching project for first-semester medical students: who is taking part and why? A cross-sectional study.

Anne-Kathrin Geier, Christiane Saur, Stefan Lippmann, Melanie Nafziger, T Frese, Tobias Deutsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne-Kathrin GeierDepartment of General Practice, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Christiane SaurDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Stefan LippmannDepartment of General Practice, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Melanie NafzigerInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
T FreseInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Tobias DeutschDepartment of General Practice, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany tobias.deutsch@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study investigates students' adoption of LeiKA, a new extracurricular longitudinal general practice (GP) teaching project. LeiKA aims to attract a broad range of students, not only those who are already planning to become GPs. This study compares participants' and non-participants' characteristics, career preferences and job-related value orientations to assess the programme's initial potential to increase the number of students subsequently entering GP careers. Additionally, students' motives for taking part in the programme were explored.

designWe analysed administrative data and data from a cross-sectional questionnaire survey for the first three cohorts. LeiKA participants were compared with non-participants regarding baseline characteristics, career intentions and attitudes associated with GP careers. There was also a qualitative analysis of the reasons for taking part.

settingFaculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Germany.

participantsFirst-semester medical students in the years 2016-2018.

resultsIn the first 3 years, 86 of 90 LeiKA slots were taken, 9.0% (n=86/960) of those eligible to apply. LeiKA participants were a mean of 0.6 years older (LeiKA: 21.5 vs whole cohort: 20.9 years, p<0.001) and slightly more interested in long-term doctor-patient relationships (3.6 vs 3.3, scale from 1 'unimportant' to 5 'very important', p=0.018), but did not differ regarding other characteristics and attitudes. Although more participants definitely favoured a GP career (13.1% vs 4.9%, p=0.001), it was a possible option for most students in both groups (78.6% vs 74.0%). Early acquisition of skills and patient contact were the main motives for taking part, stated by 60.7% and 41.7% of the participants, respectively.

conclusionsThe extracurricular programme was taken up by a broad range of students, indicating its potential to attract more students to become GPs. The reasons for taking part that we identified may guide the planning of other similar projects.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCareer ChoiceEducation, Medical, UndergraduateMotivationStudents, MedicalAdolescentAdultFemaleGeneral PracticeGermanyHumansMalePhysician-Patient RelationsYoung Adultcareer choicegeneral practicemedical curriculum developmentundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID31676656
PMCPMC6830716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.