Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31676645›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Prototyping for public health in a local context: a streamlined evaluation of a community-based weight management programme (Momenta), Northumberland, UK.

Caroline J Dodd-Reynolds, Lisa Nevens, Emily J Oliver, Tracy Finch, Amelia A Lake, Coral L Hanson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Addressing Obesity to Promote Healthy Aging.Clinics in geriatric medicine · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caroline J Dodd-ReynoldsDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK caroline.dodd-reynolds@durham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0670-8264
Lisa NevensNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Northumberland, UK.
Emily J OliverDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Tracy FinchDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Amelia A LakeDepartment of Science, School of Science, Engineering and Design, Teesside University, Teesside, UK.
Coral L HansonSchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1602-1968

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesStakeholder co-production in design of public health programmes may reduce the 'implementation gap' but can be time-consuming and costly. Prototyping, iterative refining relevant to delivery context, offers a potential solution. This evaluation explored implementation and lessons learnt for a 12-week referral-based weight-management programme, 'Momenta', along with feasibility of an iterative prototyping evaluation framework.

designMixed methods evaluation: Qualitative implementation exploration with referrers and service users; preliminary analysis of anonymised quantitative service data (12 and 52 weeks).

settingTwo leisure centres in Northumberland, North East England.

participantsIndividual interviews with referring professionals (n=5) and focus groups with service users (n=13). Individuals (n=182) referred by healthcare professionals (quantitative data).

interventionsThree 12-week programme iterations: Momenta (n=59), Momenta-Fitness membership (n=58) and Fitness membership only (n=65). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: Qualitative themes developed through stakeholder-engagement. Secondary outcomes included preliminary exploration of recruitment, uptake, retention, and changes in weight, body mass index, waist circumference and psychological well-being.

resultsService users reported positive experiences of Momenta. Implementation gaps were revealed around the referral process and practitioner knowledge. Prototyping enabled iterative refinements such as broadening inclusion criteria. Uptake and 12-week retention were higher for Momenta (84.7%, 45.8%) and Momenta-Fitness (93.1%, 60.3%) versus Fitness only (75.4%, 24.6%). Exploration of other preliminary outcomes (completers only) suggested potential for within-group weight loss and increased psychological well-being for Momenta and Momenta-Fitness at 12 weeks. 52 week follow-up data were limited (32%, 33% and 6% retention for those who started Momenta, Momenta-Fitness and Fitness, respectively) but suggested potential weight loss maintenance for Momenta-Fitness.

conclusionsIdentification of issues within the referral process enabled real-time iterative refinement, while lessons learnt may be of value for local implementation of 'off-the-shelf' weight management packages more generally. Our preliminary data for completers suggest Momenta may have potential for weight loss, particularly when offered with a fitness membership.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyCommunity Health ServicesDiet TherapyExerciseStakeholder ParticipationWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsGeneral PractitionersHumansImplementation ScienceMaleMiddle AgedObesitycommunity weight managementexercise referralimplementationnutrition & dieteticsprototypingpublic health evaluation

Identifiers

PMID31676645
PMCPMC6830698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.