Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31676508›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2020

Improving Imputation Quality in BEAGLE for Crop and Livestock Data.

Torsten Pook, Manfred Mayer, Johannes Geibel, Steffen Weigend, David Cavero, Chris C Schoen, Henner Simianer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Torsten PookDepartment of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, torsten.pook@uni-goettingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7874-8500
Manfred MayerTechnical University of Munich, Plant Breeding, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2687-8316
Johannes GeibelDepartment of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding and Genetics Group.ORCID 0000-0001-7172-3263
Steffen WeigendCenter for Integrated Breeding Research, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
David CaveroH&N International, 27472 Cuxhaven, Germany.
Chris C SchoenTechnical University of Munich, Plant Breeding, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Henner SimianerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding and Genetics Group.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imputation is one of the key steps in the preprocessing and quality control protocol of any genetic study. Most imputation algorithms were originally developed for the use in human genetics and thus are optimized for a high level of genetic diversity. Different versions of BEAGLE were evaluated on genetic datasets of doubled haploids of two European maize landraces, a commercial breeding line and a diversity panel in chicken, respectively, with different levels of genetic diversity and structure which can be taken into account in BEAGLE by parameter tuning. Especially for phasing BEAGLE 5.0 outperformed the newest version (5.1) which in turn also lead to improved imputation. Earlier versions were far more dependent on the adaption of parameters in all our tests. For all versions, the parameter ne (effective population size) had a major effect on the error rate for imputation of ungenotyped markers, reducing error rates by up to 98.5%. Further improvement was obtained by tuning of the parameters affecting the structure of the haplotype cluster that is used to initialize the underlying Hidden Markov Model of BEAGLE. The number of markers with extremely high error rates for the maize datasets were more than halved by the use of a flint reference genome (F7, PE0075 etc.) instead of the commonly used B73. On average, error rates for imputation of ungenotyped markers were reduced by 8.5% by excluding genetically distant individuals from the reference panel for the chicken diversity panel. To optimize imputation accuracy one has to find a balance between representing as much of the genetic diversity as possible while avoiding the introduction of noise by including genetically distant individuals.

Indexed as

AnimalsCrops, AgriculturalGenome-Wide Association StudyHaplotypesLivestockReference StandardsSoftwareBEAGLEimputationreference genomereference panel

Identifiers

PMID31676508
PMCPMC6945036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.