Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31676319›Full record

ArticleRegulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP2019

Development of a prioritization method for chemical-mediated effects on steroidogenesis using an integrated statistical analysis of high-throughput H295R data.

Derik E Haggard, R Woodrow Setzer, Richard S Judson, Katie Paul Friedman

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of a high-throughput H295R homogenous time resolved fluorescence assay for androgen and estrogen steroidogenesis screening.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comment on "Application of anEnvironmental health perspectives · 2022
    Article
  7. Response to "Comment on 'Application of anEnvironmental health perspectives · 2022
    Article
  8. Application of anEnvironmental health perspectives · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Derik E HaggardOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, 100 ORAU Way, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830, USA; National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA.
R Woodrow SetzerNational Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA.
Richard S JudsonNational Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA.
Katie Paul FriedmanNational Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, USA. Electronic address: paul-friedman.katie@epa.gov.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthesis of 11 steroid hormones in human adrenocortical carcinoma cells (H295R) was measured in a high-throughput steroidogenesis assay (HT-H295R) for 656 chemicals in concentration-response as part of the US Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast program. This work extends previous analysis of the HT-H295R dataset and model by examining the utility of a novel prioritization metric based on the Mahalanobis distance that reduced these 11-dimensional data to 1-dimension via calculation of a mean Mahalanobis distance (mMd) at each chemical concentration screened for all hormone measures available. Herein, we evaluated the robustness of mMd values, and demonstrate that covariance and variance of the hormones measured appear independent of the chemicals screened and are inherent to the assay; the Type I error rate of the mMd method is less than 1%; and, absolute fold changes (up or down) of 1.5 to 2-fold have sufficient power for statistical significance. As a case study, we examined hormone responses for aromatase inhibitors in the HT-H295R assay and found high concordance with other ToxCast assays for known aromatase inhibitors. Finally, we used mMd and other ToxCast cytotoxicity data to demonstrate prioritization of the most selective and active chemicals as candidates for further in vitro or in silico screening.

Indexed as

Aromatase InhibitorsCell Line, TumorData Interpretation, StatisticalDatasets as TopicEndocrine DisruptorsFalse Positive ReactionsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansReproducibility of ResultsSteroidsToxicity TestsUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyAromatase InhibitorsEndocrine DisruptorsSteroidsEndocrine disruptionPrioritizationSteroidogenesisToxCast

Identifiers

PMID31676319
PMCPMC8667012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.