ArticleBiophysical journal2019
Assessing Structural Preferences of Unstructured Protein Regions by NMR.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins in Healthy and Diseased States by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2024Review
- Characterizing conformational ensembles of multi-domain proteins using anisotropic paramagnetic NMR restraints.Biophysical reviews · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Biomacromolecules, such as proteins, often exhibit significant motions intimately associated with their function. Intrinsically disordered proteins and proteins with intrinsically disordered regions, although extremely important for a plethora of cellular functions, are difficult to structurally characterize at the atomic level because the experimental parameters report on ensemble and time averages. Here, we demonstrate for the C-terminal domain of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 capsid protein that NMR and, in particular, residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) measured for the folded portion of the protein can inform on the structural preferences of the unstructured portion using RDC-prediction tools and the maximum occurrence approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.