Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31675939›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2019

Characterization of mental health in cannabis dispensary users, using structured clinical interviews and standardized assessment instruments.

Jade C Yau, Shu Min Yu, William J Panenka, Hadley Pearce, Kristina M Gicas, Ric M Procyshyn, Caroline MacCallum, William G Honer, Alasdair M Barr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cannabis use preferences in women with myofascial pelvic pain: A cross-sectional study.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jade C YauDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, 2176 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Shu Min YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, 2176 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
William J PanenkaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Hadley PearceDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kristina M GicasDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ric M ProcyshynDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Caroline MacCallumDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
William G HonerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Alasdair M BarrDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, 2176 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada. al.barr@ubc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCannabis is commonly used for its medical properties. In particular, cannabis is purported to have beneficial effects on a wide range of neuropsychiatric conditions. Studies assessing mental health in cannabis dispensary users typically evaluate symptoms using self-report check lists, which provide limited information about symptom severity, and whether subjects meet criteria for a psychiatric diagnosis. There is, therefore, a need for studies which assess mental health in dispensary users with standardized and well validated scientific instruments, such as those used in clinical drug trials.

methodsOne hundred medical cannabis users were recruited from a community dispensary. All subjects completed a structured clinical interview with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Subjects also completed the Perceived Stress Scale-10, PROMIS Fatigue Scale, PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and the Brief Pain Inventory. Details about cannabis use were also recorded.

resultsLifetime prevalence of mental illness in this cohort was high, and a large proportion of subjects endorsed psychological symptoms. The proportion of subjects who met criteria for classification of a current psychiatric disorder was low for mood disorders, but high for anxiety disorders and substance abuse/dependence. Cannabis use differed between the main psychiatric conditions.

conclusionsThe present results indicate that rates of mental illness may be high in medical cannabis dispensary users. Use of structured clinical assessments combined with standardized symptom severity questionnaires provide a feasible way to provide a more rigorous and detailed evaluation of conditions and symptoms in this population.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana UseMedical MarijuanaMental DisordersPatient Health QuestionnairePrevalencePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSurveys and QuestionnairesMedical MarijuanaCannabisClinical interviewDispensaryMental healthMINIPsychiatric symptoms

Identifiers

PMID31675939
PMCPMC6825348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.