Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31675928›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2019

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae: determination of disk content and Kirby-Bauer breakpoint for ceftazidime/avibactam.

Xianggui Yang, Dan Wang, Qin Zhou, Fang Nie, Hongfei Du, Xueli Pang, Yingzi Fan, Tingting Bai, Ying Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Role ofOpen veterinary journal · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Rapid ResaCeftazidime-AvibactamJournal of clinical microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Management of clinical infections ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Access microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xianggui YangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, 278 Baoguang Road, Xindu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610500, People's Republic of China.
Dan WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, 278 Baoguang Road, Xindu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610500, People's Republic of China.
Qin ZhouDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, 278 Baoguang Road, Xindu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610500, People's Republic of China.
Fang NieDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, 278 Baoguang Road, Xindu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610500, People's Republic of China.
Hongfei DuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, 278 Baoguang Road, Xindu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610500, People's Republic of China.
Xueli PangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, 278 Baoguang Road, Xindu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610500, People's Republic of China.
Yingzi FanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, 278 Baoguang Road, Xindu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610500, People's Republic of China.
Tingting BaiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, 278 Baoguang Road, Xindu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610500, People's Republic of China.
Ying XuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, 278 Baoguang Road, Xindu, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610500, People's Republic of China. yingxu@cmc.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3732-7379

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetection of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) antibacterial activity is absolutely vital with the rapid growth of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). But now, there is no available automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing card for CAZ/AVI, so Kirby-Bauer has become an economical and practical method for detecting CAZ/AVI antibacterial activity against Enterobacteriaceae.

resultIn this study, antimicrobial susceptibility testing of CAZ/AVI against 386 Enterobacteriaceae (188 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 122 Escherichia coli, 76 Enterobacter cloacae) isolated from clinical patients was performed by broth microdilution. Of the 386 strains, 54 extended spectrum β lactamases negative (ESBL(-)), 104 extended spectrum β lactamases positive (ESBL(+)), 228 CRE. 287 isolates were susceptible to CAZ/AVI and 99 isolates were resistant to CAZ/AVI. At the same time, to obtain optimal content avibactam (AVI) disk containing ceftazidime (30 μg), inhibition zone diameter of four kinds of ceftazidime (30 μg) disk containing different AVI content (0 μg, 10 μg, 25 μg, 50 μg) were tested by Kirby-Bauer method. The microdilution broth method interpretation was used as the standard to estimate susceptible or resistance and then coherence analysis was carried out between Kirby-Bauer and broth microdilution. The result shows the inhibition zone diameter of 30 μg/50 μg disk, susceptible isolates: 20.5 mm-31.5 mm, resistance isolates: 8.25 mm-21.5 mm. The inhibition zone diameter of 30 μg/25 μg disk, susceptible isolates: 19.7 mm-31.3 mm, resistance isolates: 6.5 mm-19.2 mm. The inhibition zone diameter of 30 μg/10 μg disk, susceptible isolates: 19.5 mm-31 mm, resistance isolates: 6.5 mm-11 mm. The inhibition zone diameter of ceftazidime (30 μg), susceptible isolates: 6.5 mm-27.5 mm, resistance isolates 6.5 mm.

conclusionOur results show that 30 μg/50 μg, 30 μg/25 μg, 30 μg/10 μg CAZ/AVI disk have significant statistical differences to determinate CAZ/AVI antibacterial activity, but for 30 μg/50 μg disk, there has a cross section between susceptible isolates (minimum 20.5 mm) and resistance isolates (maximum 21.5 mm). For 30 μg/25 μg disk, it is hard to distinguish the difference between susceptible isolates (minimum 19.7 mm) and resistance isolates (maximum 19.2 mm), so 30 μg/10 μg CAZ/AVI disk is more conducive to determinate antibacterial activity.

Indexed as

Azabicyclo CompoundsCeftazidimeChinaDisk Diffusion Antimicrobial TestsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CombinationsDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsHumansavibactam, ceftazidime drug combinationAzabicyclo CompoundsCeftazidimeDrug CombinationsCeftazidime/avibactamDisk contentEnterobacteriaceaeKirby-Bauer breakpoints

Identifiers

PMID31675928
PMCPMC6824082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.