Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31675881›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2019

Simple differences in the protein-membrane attachment mechanism have functional consequences for surface mechanics.

K Sapp, L Maibaum, A J Sodt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K SappDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
L MaibaumDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.ORCID 0000000235168415
A J SodtEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.ORCID 0000000255708212
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes two methods for propagating coupled membrane and embedded particle dynamics with ensembles that are valid to second order in the deformation of the membrane. Proteins and functional lipids associate with cellular membranes, and their attachments influence membrane physical and dynamical properties. Therefore, it is necessary to accurately model the coupled dynamics of the membrane and any associated material of interest. We have developed two methods for coupling membrane and particle dynamics that differ in the binding mechanism of the particle to the surface. The "on-surface" mechanism should be used for particles that slide along the membrane; this description leads to an effective reduction in the membrane surface tension. The "in-surface" mechanism treats the particles as tightly bound to the lipidic binding sites; the method avoids double counting lateral entropy of implicitly modeled lipids. We emphasize the differences between these two mechanisms, when it is appropriate to use them, and how the methods differ from previously used dynamic methods.

Identifiers

PMID31675881
PMCPMC6934146
OpenAlexW2981524960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.