ArticleGigaScience2019
Sharing interoperable workflow provenance: A review of best practices and their practical application in CWLProv.
Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fusion of computational and experimental provenance in RO-Crate.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Trustworthy Agentic AI in Bioinformatics: From Workflow Automation to Traceable and Validated Biological Inference.Biology · 2026Review
- Architectural good practices for reproducible benchmarking in protein machine learning.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Warp analysis research pipelines: cloud-optimized workflows for biological data processing and reproducible analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Perceptual and technical barriers in sharing and formatting metadata accompanying omics studies.Cell genomics · 2025Review
- Applying the FAIR Principles to computational workflows.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Datagraphy: toward a systematic approach to dataset discovery.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Provenance Information for Biomedical Data and Workflows: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Implementation of FAIR Practices in Computational Metabolomics Workflows-A Case Study.Metabolites · 2024Article
- Toward a common standard for data and specimen provenance in life sciences.Learning health systems · 2024Article
- Recording provenance of workflow runs with RO-Crate.PloS one · 2024Article
- "Be sustainable": EOSC-Life recommendations for implementation of FAIR principles in life science data handling.The EMBO journal · 2023Article
- Facilitating bioinformatics reproducibility with QIIME 2 Provenance Replay.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- A workflow reproducibility scale for automatic validation of biological interpretation results.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Lightweight Distributed Provenance Model for Complex Real-world Environments.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Pre-exascale HPC approaches for molecular dynamics simulations. Covid-19 research: A use case.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science · 2022Article
- Sapporo: A workflow execution service that encourages the reuse of workflows in various languages in bioinformatics.F1000Research · 2022Article
- FAIRSCAPE: a Framework for FAIR and Reproducible Biomedical Analytics.Neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Approaches and Criteria for Provenance in Biomedical Data Sets and Workflows: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
- Design considerations for workflow management systems use in production genomics research and the clinic.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe automation of data analysis in the form of scientific workflows has become a widely adopted practice in many fields of research. Computationally driven data-intensive experiments using workflows enable automation, scaling, adaptation, and provenance support. However, there are still several challenges associated with the effective sharing, publication, and reproducibility of such workflows due to the incomplete capture of provenance and lack of interoperability between different technical (software) platforms.
resultsBased on best-practice recommendations identified from the literature on workflow design, sharing, and publishing, we define a hierarchical provenance framework to achieve uniformity in provenance and support comprehensive and fully re-executable workflows equipped with domain-specific information. To realize this framework, we present CWLProv, a standard-based format to represent any workflow-based computational analysis to produce workflow output artefacts that satisfy the various levels of provenance. We use open source community-driven standards, interoperable workflow definitions in Common Workflow Language (CWL), structured provenance representation using the W3C PROV model, and resource aggregation and sharing as workflow-centric research objects generated along with the final outputs of a given workflow enactment. We demonstrate the utility of this approach through a practical implementation of CWLProv and evaluation using real-life genomic workflows developed by independent groups.
conclusionsThe underlying principles of the standards utilized by CWLProv enable semantically rich and executable research objects that capture computational workflows with retrospective provenance such that any platform supporting CWL will be able to understand the analysis, reuse the methods for partial reruns, or reproduce the analysis to validate the published findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.