Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31675150›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2019

Intrafraction 4D-cone beam CT acquired during volumetric arc radiotherapy delivery: kV parameter optimization and 4D motion accuracy for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients.

Jian Liang, Danielle Lack, Jun Zhou, Qiang Liu, Inga Grills, Di Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Continuing Professional Development-Radiation Therapy.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Real-time marker-less tumor tracking with TOF PET:Physics in medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jian LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System -Royal Oak, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Danielle LackDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System - Troy, Troy, MI, USA.
Jun ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Qiang LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System -Royal Oak, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Inga GrillsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System -Royal Oak, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Di YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System -Royal Oak, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeElekta XVI 5.0 allows for four-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (4D CBCT) image acquisition during treatment delivery to monitor intrafraction motion. These images can have poorer image quality due to undersampling of kV projections and treatment beam MV scatter effects. We determine if a universal intrafraction preset can be used for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) lung patients and validate the accuracy of target motion characterized by XVI intrafraction 4D CBCT.

methodsThe most critical parameter within the intrafraction preset is the nominal AcquisitionInterval, which controls kV imaging acquisition frequency. An optimal value was determined by maximizing the kV frame number acquired up to 1000 frames, typical of pretreatment 4D CBCT. CIRS motion phantom intrafraction phase images for 16 SBRT beams were obtained. Mean target position, time-weighted standard deviation, and amplitude for these images as well as target motion for three SBRT lung patients were compared to respective pretreatment 4D CBCTs. Evaluation of intrafraction 4D CBCT reconstruction revealed inclusion of MV only images acquired to remove MV scatter effects. A workaround to remove these images was developed.

resultsAcquisitionInterval of 0.1°/frame was optimal. The number of kV frames acquired was 567-1116 and showed strong linear correlation with beam monitor unit (MUs). Phantom target motion accuracy was excellent with average differences in target position, standard deviation and amplitude range of ≤0.5 mm. Target tracking for SBRT patients also showed good agreement. Evaluation of phase sorting wave forms showed that inclusion of MV only images significantly impacts intrafraction image reconstruction for patients and use of workaround is necessary.

conclusionsA universal intrafraction imaging preset can be used safely for SBRT lung patients. The number of kV projections with MV delivery parameters varies; however images with fewer kV projections still provided accurate target position information. Impact of the reconstruction workaround was significant and is mandated for all 4D CBCT intrafraction imaging performed at our institution.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingCohort StudiesCone-Beam Computed TomographyFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyHumansLung NeoplasmsMovementPrognosisRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRespiration4D CBCTintrafractionmotion validationSBRT

Identifiers

PMID31675150
PMCPMC6909121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.