Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31675087›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Advance Care Planning Claims and Health Care Utilization Among Seriously Ill Patients Near the End of Life.

Deepshikha Charan Ashana, Xiaoxue Chen, Abiy Agiro, Gayathri Sridhar, Ann Nguyen, John Barron, Kevin Haynes, Michael Fisch, David Debono, Scott D Halpern and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Healthcare utilization and end-of-life care based on life-sustaining treatment decisions in patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. [Advance Directives in Geriatrics: Proposed Management Algorithm].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Letter to Your Care Providers: Implementation and Analysis of a Letter-based Advance Care Planning Initiative for Gynecologic Oncology Patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. "Don't Talk to Them About Goals of Care": Understanding Disparities in Advance Care Planning.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Overview of the Motivation of Advance Care Planning: A Study from a Medical Center in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Regional Variation in Billed Advance Care Planning Visits.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Deepshikha Charan AshanaPalliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Xiaoxue ChenTranslational Research for Affordability and Quality, HealthCore Inc, Wilmington, Delaware.
Abiy AgiroTranslational Research for Affordability and Quality, HealthCore Inc, Wilmington, Delaware.
Gayathri SridharTranslational Research for Affordability and Quality, HealthCore Inc, Wilmington, Delaware.
Ann NguyenAnthem Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana.
John BarronTranslational Research for Affordability and Quality, HealthCore Inc, Wilmington, Delaware.
Kevin HaynesTranslational Research for Affordability and Quality, HealthCore Inc, Wilmington, Delaware.
Michael FischAIM Specialty Health, Deerfield, Illinois.
David DebonoAnthem Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Scott D HalpernPalliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Michael O HarhayPalliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Funding

Cardiology & pulmonary research training grantT32HL007891 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jason D Christie · 1998 to 2026
$12.0M
Improving the fairness of RCTs among patients with acute and chronic respiratory failureK24HL143289 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Scott D Halpern · 2018 to 2026
$1.1M
Improving the measurement and analysis of long-term, patient-centered outcomes following acute respiratory failureK99HL141678 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HARHAY, MICHAEL OSCAR · 2018 to 2019
$214k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL143289NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL141678NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although advance care planning is known to increase patient and caregiver satisfaction, its association with health care utilization is not well understood. Objective: To examine the association between billed advance care planning encounters and subsequent health care utilization among seriously ill patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study conducted from October 1, 2015, to May 31, 2018, used a national commercial insurance claims database to retrieve data from 18 484 Medicare Advantage members 65 years or older who had a claim that contained a serious illness diagnosis. Exposure: A claim that contained an advance care planning billing code between October 1, 2016, and November 30, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of intensive therapies, hospitalization, emergency department use, hospice use, costs, and death during the 6-month follow-up period. Results: The final study sample included 18 484 seriously ill patients (mean [SD] age, 79.7 [7.9] years; 10 033 [54.3%] female), 864 (4.7%) of whom had a billed advanced care planning encounter between October 1, 2016, and November 30, 2017. In analyses adjusted for patient characteristics and a propensity score for advance care planning, the presence of a billed advance care planning encounter was associated with a higher likelihood of hospice enrollment (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 2.52; 95% CI, 2.22-2.86) and mortality (hazard ratio, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.79-2.88) compared with no billed advance care planning encounter. Although patients with billed advance care planning encounters were also more likely to be hospitalized (IRR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.26-1.49), including in the intensive care unit (IRR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.08-1.45), they were less likely to receive any intensive therapies (IRR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92), such as chemotherapy (IRR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.78). Similar results were observed in a propensity score-matched analysis (99% matched) and in a decedent analysis of patients who died during the 6-month follow-up period. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients with billed advance care planning encounters were more likely than those without these encounters to receive hospice services and less likely to receive any intensive therapies, such as chemotherapy. However, they were also hospitalized more frequently than patients without billed advance care planning encounters. Although these findings were robust to multiple analytic methods, the results may be attributable to residual confounding because of a higher unmeasured severity of illness in the advance care planning group. Additional evidence appears to be needed to understand the effect of advance care planning on these outcomes.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAdvance Care PlanningAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth Care CostsHospice CareHospitalizationHumansMaleMedicare Part CRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID31675087
PMCPMC6827391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.