Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31674921›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

The Reconnecting the Hand and Arm with Brain (ReHAB) Commentary on "An Integrated Brain-Machine Interface Platform With Thousands of Channels".

Robert F Kirsch, A Bolu Ajiboye, Jonathan P Miller

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert F Kirsch *VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Center for Functional Electrical Stimulation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2564-1800
A Bolu Ajiboye *Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9402-1165
Jonathan P Miller *Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5441-1751

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracortical brain-machine interfaces are a promising technology for allowing people with chronic and severe neurological disorders that resulted in loss of function to potentially regain those functions through neuroprosthetic devices. The penetrating microelectrode arrays used in almost all previous studies of intracortical brain-machine interfaces in people had a limited recording life (potentially due to issues with long-term biocompatibility), as well as a limited number of recording electrodes with limited distribution in the brain. Significant advances are required in this array interface to deal with the issues of long-term biocompatibility and lack of distributed recordings. The Musk and Neuralink manuscript proposes a novel and potentially disruptive approach to advancing the brain-electrode interface technology, with the potential of addressing many of these hurdles. Our commentary addresses the potential advantages of the proposed approach, as well as the remaining challenges to be addressed.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesArmBrainElectrodes, ImplantedMicroelectrodesbrain computer interfacingintracortical recordingneural engineeringneurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID31674921
PMCPMC6914246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.