Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31674902›Full record

ArticleSICOT-J2019

Is dual cup mobility better than hemiarthroplasty in patients with dementia and femoral neck fracture? A randomized controlled trial.

Raffaele Iorio, Ferdinando Iannotti, Daniele Mazza, Attilio Speranza, Carlo Massafra, Matteo Guzzini, Carmelo D'Arrigo, Andrea Ferretti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SICOT-J, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Arthroplasties for hip fracture in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raffaele IorioSapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome 00189, Italy.
Ferdinando IannottiSapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome 00189, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0988-5258
Daniele MazzaSapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome 00189, Italy.
Attilio SperanzaSapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome 00189, Italy.
Carlo MassafraSapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome 00189, Italy.
Matteo GuzziniSapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome 00189, Italy.
Carmelo D'ArrigoSapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome 00189, Italy.
Andrea FerrettiSapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome 00189, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatment of patients with dementia and hip fracture is challenging. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with dual mobility cup (DMC) has been designed to reduce the rate of dislocation by increasing the stability of the implant. This study aimed to compare the dislocation rates of DMC THA with hemiarthroplasty (HA) in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) and a diagnosis of dementia.

methodsAll patients with a displaced FNF and dementia diagnosis were prospectively randomized to hemiarthroplasty or THA with DMC treatment during a 2-year period. Finally, the outcomes of 30 patients in the HA group were compared with those of 30 patients in the DMC THA group. Dislocation rate at a minimum follow-up of 1 year was evaluated as the primary outcome. Reoperation rate, time to surgery, surgical time, length of hospital stay, and 30-day and 1-year mortality were also evaluated.

resultsThere was a significant difference regarding rates of dislocation in favor of THA with DMC and with regard to length of surgery (p = 0.04) in favor of bipolar HA. Dislocation occurred in five patients (16.6%) treated with bipolar HA and no one (0%) in patients treated with THA with DMC (p = 0.019). There was no difference with regard to the 30-day mortality, 1-year mortality, reoperations, and length of hospital stay between the two groups of patients. DISCUSSION: THA with DMC seems to be a safe and reliable choice to reduce the rate of dislocation at 1 year in patients with dementia and FNF without a higher risk of mortality.

Indexed as

DementiaDislocationDual mobility cupFemoral neck fractureHemiarthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID31674902
PMCPMC6824440
OpenAlexW2988258734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.