ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2020
Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Computed tomography imaging superimposition protocols to assess outcomes in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review with comprehensive recommendations.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2022Pooled it
- Association between pterygomaxillary separation during surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion and three-dimensional morphological and morphometric changes of the mandibular condyle: a cone-beam computed tomography study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Evaluating a modified proximal segment manipulation technique in sagittal split osteotomy for correcting facial asymmetry: outcomes and risk factors for Menton horizontal relapse.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Analysis and prediction of condylar resorption following orthognathic surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An automated method for assessing condyle head changes in patients with skeletal class II malocclusion based on Cone-beam CT images.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2024Article
- 3D analysis of condylar and mandibular remodeling one year after intra-oral ramus vertical lengthening osteotomy.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- The impact of CBCT-head tilting on 3D condylar segmentation reproducibility.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- Image Registration in Longitudinal Bone Assessment Using Computed Tomography.Current osteoporosis reports · 2023Review
- A Semi-Automatic Approach for Holistic 3D Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Changes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Three-Dimensional Accuracy and Stability of Personalized Implants in Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Comparison of surface- and voxel-based registration on the mandibular ramus for long-term three-dimensional assessment of condylar remodelling following orthognathic surgery.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2022Article
- Automatic 3D dense phenotyping provides reliable and accurate shape quantification of the human mandible.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- SPECT/CT Correlation in the Diagnosis of Unilateral Condilar Hyperplasia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Semi-automatic micro-CT segmentation of the midfoot using calibrated thresholds.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThree-dimensional models of mandibular condyles provide a way for condylar remodeling follow-up. The overall aim was to develop and validate a user-friendly workflow for cone beam CT (CBCT)-based semi-automatic condylar registration and segmentation.
methodsA rigid voxel-based registration (VBR) technique for registration of two post-operative CBCT-scans was tested. Two modified mandibular rami, with or without gonial angle, were investigated as the volume of interest for registration. Inter- and intraoperator reproducibility of this technique was tested on 10 mandibular rami of orthognathic patients by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC's) and descriptive statistics of the transformation values from the VBR. The difference in reproducibility between the two modified rami was evaluated using a paired
resultsExcellent ICC's (0.94-0.99) were obtained for the voxel-based registration technique using both modified rami. If the gonial angle was not included in the volume of interest, there was a trend of increased operator error suggested by significant higher interoperator differences in translation values (
conclusionsThis study provides a validated user-friendly and reproducible method of creating three-dimensional-surface models of mandibular condyles out of longitudinal CBCT-scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.