ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2020
Using Xenopus oocytes in neurological disease drug discovery.
Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research Progress on Sex Pheromone Receptors in Insects.Insects · 2026Review
- ISTransbase: an online database for inhibitor and substrate of drug transporters.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Anxiety and dysautonomia symptoms in patients with a NaClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2024Article
- Cannabidiol Strengthening of Gastric Tight Junction Complexes Analyzed in an ImprovedMembranes · 2024Article
- In Vitro Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
- Transport of Drugs and Endogenous Compounds Mediated by Human OCT1: Studies in Single- and Double-Transfected Cell Models.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- In Vitro Assays: Friends or Foes of Cell-Penetrating Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.