Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673964›Full record

ReviewJournal of applied genetics2020

Nutrigenomics in livestock-recent advances.

Joanna Nowacka-Woszuk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of applied genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Strategies for Healthier Meat Foods: An Overview.Preventive nutrition and food science · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The biological functions and metabolic pathways of valine in swine.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  13. The Interaction between Feed Bioactive Compounds and Chicken Genome.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joanna Nowacka-WoszukDepartment of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wolynska 33, 60-637, Poznan, Poland. joanna.nowacka-woszuk@up.poznan.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-3576

Funding

Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu 506.534.04.00.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of the effects of nutrients on genome functioning, in terms of gene transcription, protein levels, and epigenetic mechanisms, is referred to as nutrigenomics. Nutrigenomic studies in farm animals, as distinct from rodents, are limited by the high cost of keeping livestock, their long generational distance, and ethical aspects. Yet farm animals, and particularly pigs, can serve as valuable animal models for human gastrological diseases, since they possess similar size, physiology, and nutritional habits and can develop similar pathological states. In livestock, the effects of dietary modifications have mostly been studied with reference to effective breeding and their influence on production traits and animal health. The majority of such studies have looked at the impact of various sources and quantities of fat and protein, supplementation with microelements, and plant-derived additives. The period of life of the animal-whether prenatal, neonatal, or mature-is typically considered when a modified diet is used. This review presents a summary of recent nutrigenomic studies in livestock.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationNutrigenomicsAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAnimals, DomesticDietary SupplementsDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticHistonesLivestockNutrientsRuminantsHistonesNutrientsDietDNA methylationEpigeneticsFarm animalsGene expressionHistone modifications

Identifiers

PMID31673964
PMCPMC6968980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.