Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673871›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2019

The effects of Rhodopseudomonas palustris PSB06 and CGA009 with different agricultural applications on rice growth and rhizosphere bacterial communities.

Luyun Luo, Pei Wang, Zhongying Zhai, Pin Su, Xinqiu Tan, Deyong Zhang, Zhuo Zhang, Yong Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Characterization of the Pyrroloquinoline Quinone ProducingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of dazomet combined withFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Biocontrol activity and action mechanism ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luyun LuoCollege of Bioscience & Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Pei WangHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
Zhongying ZhaiHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
Pin SuHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
Xinqiu TanHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
Deyong ZhangHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China.
Zhuo ZhangHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China. lionkingno.1@163.com.
Yong LiuHunan Plant Protection Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Science, Changsha, China. haoasliu@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7475-891X
Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project in Hunan Province 2019LS01the National Key Research Development Program of China 2016YFD0200809the Project of Hunan Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund 2018ZD02-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the photosynthetic bacteria have been used widely in agriculture, but the effects of different agricultural applications on crop rhizosphere microorganism and crops are lack. In this study, we provide new insights into the structure and composition of the rice root-associated microbiomes as well as the effect on crop of the Rhodopseudomonas palustris(R. palustris) PSB06 and CGA009 at the rice seedling stage with seed immersion and root irrigation. Compare with CK group, the length of stem, the peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities in PSB06 treatment group was significantly higher, while the length of stem in CGA009 treatment group was significantly higher. The POD and SOD activities in CGA009 treatment groups only were higher slightly than the CK group. In the study, the dominant phyla were Proteobacteria (51.95-61.66%), Bacteroidetes (5.40-9.39%), Acidobacteria (4.50-10.52%), Actinobacteria (5.06-8.14%), Planctomycetes (2.90-4.48%), Chloroflexi (2.23-5.06%) and Firmicutes (2.38-7.30%), accounted for 87% bacterial sequences. The principal coordinate analysis (pCoA) and mantel results showed the two application actions of R. palustris CGA009 and PSB06 had significant effects on rice rhizosphere bacterial communities (p < 0.05). The PSB06 can significantly promote the rice growth and enhance stress resistance of rice at the seedling stage, while the R. palustris CGA009 has no significant effect on rice. Dissimilarity test and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) results showed that the TN and pH were the key factors affecting rice rhizosphere bacterial community in the seedling stage. This study will provide some guidance advices for the study of the microecological regulation of photosynthetic bacteria on crops.

Indexed as

CGA009Photosynthetic bacteriaPSB06Rhizosphere microorganismRice

Identifiers

PMID31673871
PMCPMC6823419
OpenAlexW2986852352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.