Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673867›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2019

Metagenomic study of endophytic bacterial community of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) cultivated in different soil and climatic conditions.

Ramesh Raj Puri, Fumihiko Adachi, Masayuki Omichi, Yuichi Saeki, Akihiro Yamamoto, Shohei Hayashi, Md Arshad Ali, Kazuhito Itoh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. DNA extraction from sweetpotato (Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bacterial community structure of the sunflower (Plant signaling & behavior · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ramesh Raj PuriThe United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Tottori University, 4-101 Koyama-Minami, Tottori, 680-8553, Japan.
Fumihiko AdachiFaculty of Life and Environmental Science, Shimane University, 1060 Nishikawatsu, Matsue, 690-8504, Shimane, Japan.
Masayuki OmichiDepartment of Agricultural Science and Business, Takushoku University, Hokkaido College, Memu 4558, Fukagawa, 074-8585, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yuichi SaekiFaculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, Gakuen-Kibanadai-Nishi 1-1, Miyazaki, 889-2192, Japan.
Akihiro YamamotoFaculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, Gakuen-Kibanadai-Nishi 1-1, Miyazaki, 889-2192, Japan.
Shohei HayashiFaculty of Life and Environmental Science, Shimane University, 1060 Nishikawatsu, Matsue, 690-8504, Shimane, Japan.
Md Arshad AliInstitute of Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Kazuhito ItohThe United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Tottori University, 4-101 Koyama-Minami, Tottori, 680-8553, Japan. itohkz@life.shimane-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0932-2156

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16KT0032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to clarify effects of soil and climatic conditions on community structure of sweet potato bacterial endophytes by applying locked nucleic acid oligonucleotide-PCR clamping technique and metagenomic analysis. For this purpose, the soil samples in three locations were transferred each other and sweet potato nursery plants from the same farm were cultivated for ca. 3 months. After removal of plastid, mitochondria and undefined sequences, the averaged numbers of retained sequences and operational taxonomic units per sample were 20,891 and 846, respectively. Proteobacteria (85.0%), Bacteroidetes (6.6%) and Actinobacteria (6.3%) were the three most dominant phyla, accounting for 97.9% of the reads, and γ-Proteobacteria (66.3%) being the most abundant. Top 10 genera represented 81.2% of the overall reads in which Pseudomonas (31.9-45.0%) being the most predominant. The overall endophytic bacterial communities were similar among the samples which indicated that the soil and the climatic conditions did not considerably affect the entire endophytic community. The original endophytic bacterial community might be kept during the cultivation period.

Indexed as

ClimateMetagenomeMicrobiotaBacteriaBase SequenceBiodiversityDNA, BacterialDNA, MitochondrialEndophytesIpomoea batatasPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil MicrobiologyDNA, BacterialDNA, MitochondrialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilEndophytic bacteriaLocked nucleic acidMetagenomicsMicrobial communitySweet potato

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.