Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673853›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2019

Incidence of surrogacy in the USA and Israel and implications on women's health: a quantitative comparison.

Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli, Piero Montebruno

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The newly enacted Italian surrogacy law: Effects on reproductive tourism.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Commercial Surrogacy: An Overview.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Review
  6. The ART clock: Temporal limits to assisted reproduction.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daphna Birenbaum-CarmeliDepartment of Nursing, University of Haifa, 3498838, Haifa, Israel. daphna@research.haifa.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0186-6001
Piero MontebrunoDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge, CB2 3EN, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Haifa · IL

Funding

Wellcome Trust 209829/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGestational surrogacy (GS) has been researched in multiple qualitative studies. In contrast, quantitative aspects of the practice are conspicuously understudied. The present article assesses and compares the incidence of GS in the USA and Israel, two industrialized countries that have maintained active commercial surrogacy practice, for over two decades.

methodThe article is a secondary analysis of GS figures published by the Israeli Parliament's Centre for Research and Information (2018) and by the USA's Centers for Disease Control (2016) and related professional publications. Each dataset is analyzed in reference to the respective country, so as to devise local incidence scores that are then juxtaposed in inter-country comparison.

resultsThe incidence of GS rises steeply in both countries. Though US surrogates are contracted by local and international, heterosexual and gay, and partnered and single intended parents, the relative incidence of GS is lower in the USA than in Israel, where only local heterosexual couples could contract a gestational surrogate. An exceptionally high rate of multiple births was observed in both settings, suggesting some overlooking of professional recommendations for elective single-embryo transfer.

conclusionGS incidence appears to resemble the ratio between the countries' respective fertility rates. The paper underscores two main risks facing gestational surrogates: the risk of not conceiving and not being paid and the risk of carrying a multiple pregnancy, which is extremely prevalent in GS pregnancies, and sustaining the short- and long-term health complications that are more prevalent in such pregnancies.

Indexed as

Gestational CarriersFemaleFertilization in VitroHeterosexualityHumansIsraelPregnancyPregnancy, MultipleReproductive Techniques, AssistedSingle Embryo TransferUnited StatesWomen's HealthGestational surrogacyincidenceIsraelmultiple birthsquantitative assessmentUSA

Identifiers

PMID31673853
PMCPMC6911123
OpenAlexW2982619970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.