Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673788›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

Artificial intelligence and radiomics in nuclear medicine: potentials and challenges.

Cumali Aktolun

Erratum issuedAbstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Technological Advances in SPECT and SPECT/CT Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Artificial Intelligence and Precision Medicine: A Perspective.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine image generation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021
    Review
  12. Leveraging Data Science for a Personalized Haemodialysis.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Cumali AktolunIzmir University of Economics, Balcova, 35330, Izmir, Turkey. aktolun@aktolun.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence involves a wide range of smart techniques that are applicable to medical services including nuclear medicine. Recent advances in computer power, availability of accumulated digital archives containing large amount of patient images, and records bring new opportunities for the implementation of artificial techniques in nuclear medicine. As a subset of artificial intelligence, machine learning is an emerging tool that possibly perform many clinical tasks. Nuclear medicine community needs to adapt to this fast approaching smart era, to exploit the opportunities and tackle the problems associated with artificial intelligence tools. It is aimed in this editorial to outline the potentials and challenges of artificial intelligence applications in nuclear medicine.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNuclear MedicineHumansMolecular ImagingArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networksDeep learningMachine learningRadiomicsSupervised learningUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.