Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31673775›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of hematology2019

RVD induction and autologous stem cell transplantation followed by lenalidomide maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a phase 2 study of the Finnish Myeloma Group.

Sini Luoma, Pekka Anttila, Marjaana Säily, Tuija Lundan, Jouni Heiskanen, Timo Siitonen, Sakari Kakko, Mervi Putkonen, Hanna Ollikainen, Venla Terävä and 17 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Steps towards a Multiple Myeloma Cure?Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Sini LuomaComprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. sini.luoma@hus.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-7027
Pekka AnttilaComprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Marjaana SäilyHematology-Oncology Unit, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Tuija LundanDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and TYKSLAB, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Jouni HeiskanenComprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Timo SiitonenHematology-Oncology Unit, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Sakari KakkoHematology-Oncology Unit, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Mervi PutkonenHematology Unit, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Hanna OllikainenDepartment of Medicine, Satakunta Central Hospital, Pori, Finland.
Venla TeräväHematology Unit, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Marja SankeloHematology Unit, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Anu PartanenDepartment of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Kirsi LaunonenHematology-Oncology Unit, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Anu RäsänenDepartment of Medicine, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland.
Anu SikiöDepartment of Medicine, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Merja SuominenDepartment of Medicine, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, Hämeenlinna, Finland.
Piotr BaziaDepartment of Medicine, Kainuu Central Hospital, Kajaani, Finland.
Kristiina KananenDepartment of Medicine, Kainuu Central Hospital, Kajaani, Finland.
Juha LievonenComprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tuomas SelanderScience Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Tarja-Terttu PelliniemiFimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere, Finland.
Sorella IlveskeroHUSLAB Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Virva HuotariFimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere, Finland.
Pentti MäntymaaLaboratory of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Anri TienhaaraDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and TYKSLAB, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Esa JantunenDepartment of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Raija SilvennoinenComprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center Y1018XPA01Research Committee of the Kuopio University Hospital catchment area 5101424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) combined with novel agents is the standard treatment for transplant-eligible, newly diagnosed myeloma (NDMM) patients. Lenalidomide is approved for maintenance after ASCT until progression, although the optimal duration of maintenance is unknown. In this trial, 80 patients with NDMM received three cycles of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone followed by ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance until progression or toxicity. The primary endpoint was the proportion of flow-negative patients. Molecular response was assessed if patients were flow-negative or in stringent complete response (sCR). By intention to treat, the overall response rate was 89%. Neither median progression-free survival nor overall survival (OS) has been reached. The OS at 3 years was 83%. Flow-negativity was reached in 53% and PCR-negativity in 28% of the patients. With a median follow-up of 27 months, 29 (36%) patients are still on lenalidomide and 66% of them have sustained flow-negativity. Lenalidomide maintenance phase was reached in 8/16 high-risk patients but seven of them have progressed after a median of only 6 months. In low- or standard-risk patients, the outcome was promising, but high-risk patients need more effective treatment approach. Flow-negativity with the conventional flow was an independent predictor for longer PFS.

Indexed as

Maintenance ChemotherapyMultiple MyelomaStem Cell TransplantationAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAutograftsBortezomibDexamethasoneDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFinlandHumansLenalidomideMaleMiddle AgedBortezomibDexamethasoneLenalidomideFlow cytometryLenalidomideMaintenanceMinimal residual diseaseMultiple myelomaPCR

Identifiers

PMID31673775
PMCPMC6900265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.