SynthesisPediatric cardiology2020
What is Left Ventricular Strain in Healthy Neonates? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fetal Cardiac Deformation in Persistent Left-Sided Superior Vena Cava and Suspected Coarctation of the Aorta.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Left ventricular myocardial strain in neonates is influenced by the definition of the basal region of interest.Echo research and practice · 2025Article
- Cardiac function in children with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: cardiac strain at birth and at 2-5 weeks of age.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Longitudinal Strain vs. Conventional Echocardiographic Parameters in the First Week of Life in Healthy Term Newborns.Pediatric cardiology · 2024Article
- Left atrial strain in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and length of stay in pediatric intensive care unit.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Developmental Differences in Left Ventricular Strain in IUGR vs. Control Children the First Three Months of Life.Pediatric cardiology · 2022Article
- Interobserver Agreement and Reference Intervals for Biventricular Myocardial Deformation in Full-Term, Healthy Newborns: A 2D Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography-Based Strain Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The influence of region of interest width in fetal 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography late in pregnancy.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Speckle tracking derived strain in neonates: planes, layers and drift.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- Effect of Temporal and Spatial Smoothing on Speckle-Tracking-Derived Strain in Neonates.Pediatric cardiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reference values for left ventricular systolic strain in healthy neonates are necessary for clinical application of strain. The objectives of this systematic review were to identify echocardiographic studies that presented left ventricular strain values in healthy neonates, perform a meta-analysis for speckle tracking-derived global longitudinal strain, and identify areas that require further investigation. A structured search was applied to MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials in search of echocardiographic studies that presented left ventricular strain in healthy neonates. 244 studies were identified, of which 16 studies including speckle tracking and tissue Doppler strain in the longitudinal, radial, and circumferential directions passed the screening process. Out of these 16 studies, a meta-analysis was performed on the 10 studies that reported speckle tracking global longitudinal strain. Mean speckle tracking-derived global longitudinal strain was 21.0% (95% Confidence Interval 19.6-22.5%, strain given as positive values). When the studies were divided into subgroups, mean speckle tracking global longitudinal strain from the four-chamber view was 19.5% (95% Confidence Interval 18.0-21.0%) and that derived from all three apical views was 22.5% (95% CI 20.6-24.7%), indicating that global longitudinal strain from the four-chamber view is slightly lower than global longitudinal strain from all three apical views. Neonatal strain values were close to strain values in older subjects found in previous meta-analyses. Further studies are recommended that examine strain rate, segmental strain values, strain derived from short axis views, and strain in the first few hours after birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31673733What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.